Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Apr 2021 07:17:45 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=E1clav_Kubern=E1t?= <kubernat@cesnet.cz>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] hwmon: (max31790) Rework to use regmap
Message-ID: <20210426141745.GA257701@roeck-us.net>
References: <20210413025948.901867-1-kubernat@cesnet.cz>
 <250c1c16-541a-984f-c720-1a8b6176e97e@roeck-us.net>
 <CABKa3npjrpq5Aw_Xqy3mFZtUHZcfB0YENxEDgo_MCwPUKqA4ww@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CABKa3npjrpq5Aw_Xqy3mFZtUHZcfB0YENxEDgo_MCwPUKqA4ww@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:46:27PM +0200, V?clav Kubern?t wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I'm sending a new version of my patch on max31790. This new version
> fixes the cache issue and actually makes it work by setting
> .cache_type. You were right about the "yes/no" ranges, so I flipped
> those.
> 
> By the way, it seems that the reason your reply got lost is because of
> weird addresses in the "Cc:" email field, they end with "cesnet.cz",
> so it could be that I'm sending email incorrectly. Let me know if I'm
> doing something wrong.
> 

Yes, the To: field of your series is either empty (for the first patch
of the series), or it is something like:
	To: unlisted-recipients: no To-header on input <;

Also, you send your follow-up series as response of the previous series
which doesn't follow the guidance for submitting patches and may result
in the entire series getting lost.

Guenter