From: Glenn Enright <elinar@ihug.co.nz>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] DocBook with .txt or .html versions?
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:29:07 +1300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
References: <20061018114240.GA3202@ff.dom.local> <200610192214.23618.elinar@ihug.co.nz> <20061019100932.GC3296@ff.dom.local>
In-Reply-To: <20061019100932.GC3296@ff.dom.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200610192329.07361.elinar@ihug.co.nz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 834
Lines: 18

On Thursday 19 October 2006 23:09, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> I'm sorry if I implied... It is not a problem of limited resources.
> If I can choose I allways tend to install only necessary software.
I suppose that certainly helps when chasing bugs. Did you have an 
alternative way of building the docs in mind that could be lighter? I 
admit the tree you described does seem a large pull just so you can 
read some text for one source package... even if it is the kernel.

> Thanks for your 2c (they are rarity here!),
You're welcome 

-- 
Please don't CC messages to me from mailing lists.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/