Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423313AbWJSLwL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:52:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423317AbWJSLwL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:52:11 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:46722 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423313AbWJSLwK (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Oct 2006 07:52:10 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Muli Ben-Yehuda Subject: Re: PCI-DMA: Disabling IOMMU Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Sebastian Biallas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <45364248.2020901@biallas.net> <200610182348.44968.ak@suse.de> <20061019051528.GE4582@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20061019051528.GE4582@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610191352.35177.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 564 Lines: 14 > The original message is misleading - there may certainly be more than > one IOMMU and then we will end up "disabling IOMMU" and then > "reenabling IOMMU" later when we detect another one. Can we at least > make it "disabling GART IOMMU"? Ok, although the printk is already guarded by a test for another IOMMU -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/