Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 26 Apr 2021 23:22:54 +0530
From:   bkkarthik <bkkarthik@pesu.pes.edu>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@gmail.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Adam <developer@arusty.dev>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: pnp: proc.c: Removed unnecessary varibles
Message-ID: <20210426175254.g63l272o4hnagcs2@burgerking>
References: <20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu>
 <ea09f455-a00f-a13d-29d8-e3f9790dba56@linuxfoundation.org>
 <YIZIHR0ZQPXFkOH1@unreal>
 <CAJZ5v0gRv-1qYiN8EXx12iOiJvX7ORzqQfHvtWDnZLtpg6Aijg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YIa3H6kGFXiqWRtg@unreal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YIa3H6kGFXiqWRtg@unreal>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Precedence: bulk

On 21/04/26 03:50PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:00:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 6:57 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:08:03PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > > On 4/22/21 12:03 PM, Anupama K Patil wrote:
> > > > > de, e are two variables of the type 'struct proc_dir_entry'
> > > > > which can be removed to save memory. This also fixes a coding style
> > > > > issue reported by checkpatch where we are suggested to make assignment
> > > > > outside the if statement.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like a reasonable change.
> > >
> > > It is unclear how much changes to ISA code are welcomed.

If changes to ISA code aren't welcomed, should these be marked obsolete in the MAINTIANERS file?

> > 
> > Real fixes and obvious cleanups are, not much more than that.
> 
> While first part is easy to determine, the second one is more blurry.
> 
> > 
> > > According to the Wikipedia, even Windows Vista disabled ISA PnP by default.
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specifications

I wasn't aware until after this reply. Sorry about that!

thanks,

karthik

> > 
> > It is indeed unclear how many systems with this interface still run
> > Linux, but as long as the code is in the tree, there's nothing wrong
> > with attempting to improve it.  There's no assurance that all such
> > patches will be applied, though.
> > 
> > Thanks!