Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp4413853pxy; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaAXwVm4upQdrm1BloTtT7d7RQgYLs0kZ1GsAOaSwKSyTGizmnXJhH+hA2pFGpDdcoyHdJ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c981:: with SMTP id c1mr3789157edt.7.1619523570085; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619523570; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WfKmLCqo11+4NFxjR6lHX3fEyfBexF11ZmN9BHaaz2llVpWJ/dq1BppMJOa0u8JOOi CpunpQIxjBbjwq6LfQyVnDHQfHTJ+RHRTruPHAwT6btvwSJaT6q4J8TCvc1I6XNNCido oHrHrZTHXBMcVSjpch1fPMOr8+eOU6k9hRPQA41MswvRKsuRfYsDGlq7RMXOvM8p7eER /ZdZXqoGzewNGWjO/awS1I6uGipN+SnNbuCDvlTX7BoGpJ67JKzMyzgrExGj7bM+reSg XoaKeP0dhFWSu97ftpRt1E2zSBEgB057IRtlmjg8G0+/g5/4BdWiOi6W924PfleTiOl5 ENlQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=xVtKpSAGcFxdnX04Z6hrAk10SmLPj+Q8iRVK+ABKdgY=; b=t9DCxgYQKPqWe0Uk7p6byRM9024y9tlHTbuVcCjvaTL1calx1NW5FqQuCYX0EVCtgJ 5EeEqmXpkn0PtsKw+vFrna1tlrJBffohP3r+EOOl7x3T02+ZMVYqx1kTgQAbZsUTAldd IhX0ghLnNjV0g5zf5gnEmy9vDLkP20pC6yon7pitpjkoqJjbHjf6PosjfMbnK/uyqpVi xCaE/dMv7UoeVf7nOdEe50NuQPpDqQvIzlU+2rEcT5So4+EzNNUIWXImyqTXtMF+VW/o g5DGofJ6cleUqcBJm9JYl9odXMFs0m2qNnq/asSpkFsx7TDY42PEtNwKuAsMM7tHui2u kk8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si2320763edr.409.2021.04.27.04.39.06; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 04:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235930AbhD0Liu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:38:50 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2929 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235882AbhD0Lig (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:38:36 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FV01561M5z71ffd; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 19:30:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from roberto-ThinkStation-P620.huawei.com (10.204.62.217) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:37:45 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: , , , CC: , , , , , , Roberto Sassu Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] evm: Prepare for moving to the LSM infrastructure Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:37:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20210427113732.471066-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.204.62.217] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.201) To fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch set depends on: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210409114313.4073-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210407105252.30721-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com/ One of the challenges that must be tackled to move IMA and EVM to the LSM infrastructure is to ensure that EVM is capable to correctly handle multiple stacked LSMs providing an xattr at file creation. At the moment, there are few issues that would prevent a correct integration. This patch set aims at solving them. From the LSM infrastructure side, the LSM stacking feature added the possibility of registering multiple implementations of the security hooks, that are called sequentially whenever someone calls the corresponding security hook. However, security_inode_init_security() and security_old_inode_init_security() are currently limited to support one xattr provided by LSM and one by EVM. In addition, using the call_int_hook() macro causes some issues. According to the documentation in include/linux/lsm_hooks.h, it is a legitimate case that an LSM returns -EOPNOTSUPP when it does not want to provide an xattr. However, the loop defined in the macro would stop calling subsequent LSMs if that happens. In the case of security_old_inode_init_security(), using the macro would also cause a memory leak due to replacing the *value pointer, if multiple LSMs provide an xattr. From EVM side, the first operation to be done is to change the definition of evm_inode_init_security() to be compatible with the security hook definition. Unfortunately, the current definition does not provide enough information for EVM, as it must have visibility of all xattrs provided by LSMs to correctly calculate the HMAC. This patch set changes the security hook definition by replacing the name, value and len triple with the xattr array allocated by security_inode_init_security(). Secondly, EVM must know how many elements are in the xattr array. EVM can rely on the fact that the xattr array must be terminated with an element with name field set to NULL, but can also benefit from the enhancements that have been included in this version of the patch set. Casey suggested to use the reservation mechanism currently implemented for other security blobs, for xattrs. In this way, security_inode_init_security() can know after LSM initialization how many slots for xattrs should be allocated, and LSMs know the offset in the array from where they can start writing xattrs. One of the problem was that LSMs can decide at run-time, although they reserved a slot, to not use it (for example because they were not initialized). Given that the initxattrs() method implemented by filesystems expect that the array is continuous, they would miss the slots after the one not being initialized. security_inode_init_security() should have been modified to compact the array. Instead, the preferred solution was to introduce the base slot as a parameter, in addition to the xattr array, containing the up to date information about the slots used by previous LSMs. The correctness of the update of the slot is ensured by both the LSMs, if they use the new helper lsm_find_xattr_slot(), and by security_inode_init_security() which checks the slot each time after an LSM executes the inode_init_security hook. This patch set has been tested by introducing several instances of a TestLSM (some providing an xattr, some not, one with a wrong implementation to see how the LSM infrastructure handles it). The patch is not included in this set but it is available here: https://github.com/robertosassu/linux/commit/c7e01af6cb2c6780f0b143070269fff7e30053f9 The test, added to ima-evm-utils, is available here: https://github.com/robertosassu/ima-evm-utils/blob/evm-multiple-lsms-v3-devel-v7/tests/evm_multiple_lsms.test The test takes a UML kernel built by Travis and launches it several times, each time with a different combination of LSMs. After boot, it first checks that there is an xattr for each LSM providing it, and then calculates the HMAC in user space and compares it with the HMAC calculated by EVM in kernel space. A test report can be obtained here: https://travis-ci.com/github/robertosassu/ima-evm-utils/jobs/501101861 SELinux Test Suite result (diff 5.11.14-200.fc33.x86_64 5.12.0-rc8+): -Files=70, Tests=1099, 82 wallclock secs ( 0.35 usr 0.09 sys + 7.39 cusr 10.14 csys = 17.97 CPU) +Files=70, Tests=1108, 85 wallclock secs ( 0.34 usr 0.10 sys + 7.25 cusr 11.39 csys = 19.08 CPU) Result: FAIL -Failed 2/70 test programs. 5/1099 subtests failed. +Failed 2/70 test programs. 5/1108 subtests failed. Smack Test Suite result: smack_set_ambient 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_ambient" success. smack_set_current 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_current" success. smack_set_doi 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_doi" success. smack_set_netlabel 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_netlabel" success. smack_set_socket_labels 1 TPASS : Test smack_set_socket_labels success. smack_set_cipso 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_cipso" success. smack_set_direct 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_direct" success. smack_set_load 1 TPASS: Test "smack_set_load" success. smack_set_onlycap 1 TFAIL: The smack label reported for "/smack/onlycap" Lastly, running the test on reiserfs to check security_old_inode_init_security(), some issues have been discovered: a free of xattr->name which is not correct after commit 9548906b2bb7 ('xattr: Constify ->name member of "struct xattr"'), missing calls to reiserfs_security_free() and a misalignment with security_inode_init_security() (the old version expects the full xattr name with the security. prefix, the new version just the suffix). The last issue has not been fixed yet. Changelog v2: - rewrite selinux_old_inode_init_security() to use security_inode_init_security() - add lbs_xattr field to lsm_blob_sizes structure, to give the ability to LSMs to reserve slots in the xattr array (suggested by Casey) - add new parameter base_slot to inode_init_security hook definition v1: - add calls to reiserfs_security_free() and initialize sec->value to NULL (suggested by Tetsuo and Mimi) - change definition of inode_init_security hook, replace the name, value and len triple with the xattr array (suggested by Casey) - introduce lsm_find_xattr_slot() helper for LSMs to find an unused slot in the passed xattr array Roberto Sassu (6): reiserfs: Add missing calls to reiserfs_security_free() security: Rewrite security_old_inode_init_security() security: Pass xattrs allocated by LSMs to the inode_init_security hook security: Support multiple LSMs implementing the inode_init_security hook evm: Align evm_inode_init_security() definition with LSM infrastructure evm: Support multiple LSMs providing an xattr fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 4 + fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c | 1 + include/linux/evm.h | 19 +++-- include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h | 4 +- include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 22 +++++- security/integrity/evm/evm.h | 2 + security/integrity/evm/evm_crypto.c | 9 ++- security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 30 +++++-- security/security.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++----- security/selinux/hooks.c | 18 +++-- security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 27 ++++--- 11 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1