Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 15:43:41 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 074/190] Revert "drm/gma500: fix memory disclosures due
 to uninitialized bytes"
Message-ID: <YIgVDakyru+kuhoV@kroah.com>
References: <20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 <20210421130105.1226686-75-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CAKMK7uF6sWeKX0DAaXoT9=xkD9eAAjHtkE0gn+v9YxmYAd3vdg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKMK7uF6sWeKX0DAaXoT9=xkD9eAAjHtkE0gn+v9YxmYAd3vdg@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 07:51:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This reverts commit ec3b7b6eb8c90b52f61adff11b6db7a8db34de19.
> >
> > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad
> > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known
> > malicious" changes.  The result of these submissions can be found in a
> > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
> > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing
> > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University
> > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota).
> >
> > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from
> > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if
> > they actually are a valid fix.  Until that work is complete, remove this
> > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the
> > codebase.
> >
> > Cc: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Cc: https
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> gma500 is dead enough I'm not going to spend a single cycle thinking
> whether this fixes anything or not and hence whether the revert is ok
> or not.

Sounds good to me, I'll keep the reverts.

greg k-h