Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:16:10 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@collabora.com>,
        kernelci-results@groups.io,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
        Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@gmail.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
        Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: broonie-sound/for-next bisection:
 baseline.bootrr.asoc-simple-card-probed on kontron-sl28-var3-ads2
In-Reply-To: <20210427135703.GH4605@sirena.org.uk>
References: <6080e82c.1c69fb81.cd60c.2a13@mx.google.com>
 <3ca62063-41b4-c25b-a7bc-8a8160e7b684@collabora.com>
 <877dkp5141.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <20210426144242.GF4590@sirena.org.uk>
 <8735vc4r59.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
 <20210427101926.GA4605@sirena.org.uk>
 <ea2b6dae-3087-67d3-8473-410255a51e23@collabora.com>
 <e20b9c8a2715b5d091a8d1f37ba890b4@walle.cc>
 <20210427135703.GH4605@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11
Message-ID: <cc9a39f977c3765d1060ab1b0038bc79@walle.cc>
Precedence: bulk

Am 2021-04-27 15:57, schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 03:43:42PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> Am 2021-04-27 14:51, schrieb Guillaume Tucker:
>> > On 27/04/2021 11:19, Mark Brown wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:28:34AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
>> > > > > > If so, all sai1 - sai6 are using "fsl,vf610-sai",
>> > > > > > all saiX doesn't have .name. I think it should have different name.
>> > > > > > In your case, at least, sai5 / sai6 needs to have

Where does that (null) come from? I've briefly tried the following
patch and I'd assume I get a duplicate for "abc-wm8904-hifi", but I 
still
get the old (null)-wm8904-hifi.

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
index 407a45e48eee..36280008b5c6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
@@ -1081,6 +1081,7 @@ static int fsl_sai_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
         sai->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_rate = 1;
         sai->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_channels = 1;
         sai->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_sample_bits = 1;
+       sai->cpu_dai_drv.name = "abc";

         if (of_find_property(np, "fsl,sai-synchronous-rx", NULL) &&
             of_find_property(np, "fsl,sai-asynchronous", NULL)) {


> There was a question from Morimoto-san (quoted above) about the 
> hardware
> configuration so he could confirm what patches to write.

We are using two instances of the fsl,vf610-sai, yes. Was that the
question?

-michael