Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp4804135pxy; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:04:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzudLDMOdt8Vudv0j0TEg24bRwtM6uAd/Z7WVvpgZ+w5UWgiIUB3UTVBQgte0JSL6DkRZ/ X-Received: by 2002:a63:f447:: with SMTP id p7mr22963657pgk.272.1619553843764; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:04:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619553843; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=grcuzovVH1t7pRoMhL5wyKHunYiPx02y4ihrgipPu4uvuBIJkLO5I18s4B2aEKXnbs wJSwhPX/MW6SgyZzCRoEQwCemyIiM9pVGAj1Ev+1g5YKKSdK++yQToqsn0sg92ZHURJr /8NrKIVweBsTWl1qLq8yP5OnYKItRv2SJ1NS5ukhzzZ9Ae0mXYFajnF0zkF5Q8eNvIBZ DC18+l59uDX7zIMzqom2wIsXbnT2tz4TLwo/hKnebeEMRlNBVINIn1f3YvBN6vJY6DJ7 5sTwN62n/ahrpuPW3uevC43fvFKCS1dvSn950DYoO7lL5OkKLNXLRRWRjxpsjwCydXDw Ed5A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=kWb+u5lHbSE2K4wZrJfb4KDMLjOmVqGo2GjajvJMOFI=; b=bhDnp+8qxZhfyeThqyUA1ihdmIcmJx0tDh8RYecPx0In8SPQNVkKr/xHZ0OBet9aXR r4xhvHIde8Mv4J+cLITLaHqYfCHRRC4z2nGfITMD/Kt9rsoC30St95xtJEQVJuhyXOqD YiXeSonitiy/3XM0/MNmI4dVgsoL2qNO84FMUdJh8RnBOj/K0Q7FXrXGezGorcPykeIa lzD5LmGqIrFSUsIsUSxu9IDaBmJnf+CUkcRXYwKpfDjFYsaC8PZ2HnhqRgaW3/JYSve3 DkmrMjtl42UdUH9jiMjK5tIx74hVvJTAhLxsuA8X17STWT+hreiXCG/Ris5FvOOO7qIP 53xw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=vlxMA+PW; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d22si831459pgv.49.2021.04.27.13.03.38; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 13:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=vlxMA+PW; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238811AbhD0UA3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:00:29 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:43414 "EHLO galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235719AbhD0UA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:00:28 -0400 From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1619553583; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kWb+u5lHbSE2K4wZrJfb4KDMLjOmVqGo2GjajvJMOFI=; b=vlxMA+PWBbA1ChYXEUqvHEsTzGqVNdA9qLzzXZ71HumV2VTWmn5kSlPbyffgTwXYhbQYBr juY2JCOZoCWI1UCpIYR4ktd52zlUW186FaoXvZqbYXrEZfiKSL+8pNB7rIETNCQNf1yxNK AX7wk+jnLZX0nO1qOWsa5vP5ZYTX52AFlaPdPBjQndT3RXtxyUkSzMgmBWOIzAwOG/UnDR 3Wimxrj9LrigQ8DdutnRUqGSfAo8386igvT7K8VXODQ9wDWiKKwtPP5yteRx4MIp/wWNT3 l5v1YyypoZG9ER/v9vQ2IMC7h8WHDDrzv1cHyBy2tAuvfZNIuJ4aI2NFSC81fQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1619553583; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kWb+u5lHbSE2K4wZrJfb4KDMLjOmVqGo2GjajvJMOFI=; b=TEHEYt+XG/QKqlwfJOzEnMg+4+iyczXBlI2bspQMRi5u2LzBGFxZ+zb+Pv8auts+Mn7Sf9 MvLK0AyQ8v2y58BA== To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: LKML , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Xu , Nitesh Narayan Lal , Alex Belits , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , John Stultz Subject: Re: [patch 8/8] hrtimer: Avoid more SMP function calls in clock_was_set() In-Reply-To: <20210427151125.GA171315@fuller.cnet> References: <20210427082537.611978720@linutronix.de> <20210427083724.840364566@linutronix.de> <20210427151125.GA171315@fuller.cnet> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 21:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <877dkno5w0.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 27 2021 at 12:11, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:25:45AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Consider > > > hrtimer_interrupt > in_hrtirq = 1 > __run_hrtimer > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_base->lock, flags) > settimeofday > clock_was_set > lock cpu_base->lock > update_needs_ipi returns false > continue to process hrtimers with stale base->offset Bah. I somehow convinced myself that hrtimer_interrupt() rechecks the offset before clearing in_hrtirq, but that's not true. It does so when reprogramming fails, but not for the regular case. Lemme stare at it some more. Thanks, tglx