Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp5057363pxy; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:04:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxra9XR2cfLRjRpa6wY7H17Ykc+wsk+sBjEkcg7f2wHPget1NHkQsYEpksy1rxJ58WFuUj8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2310:b029:eb:73d5:3e4e with SMTP id d16-20020a1709032310b02900eb73d53e4emr27246322plh.66.1619579052087; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:04:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619579052; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L4vgsWZmcxtA83OA8b2xPnvQmrIWrCUV8LVR0dQ54g9CzdKxn5mhBL86zR8ClMTrY7 I0DctQIugbyW6RIMYBPJKG9U9bzIXNoA6CGI8V6LFQXKLCxU48+Epa39E8Pf3eLEdItQ Kl8afUKsPHfLYNX6SD55pNWg6IMmwNUjYN8NS41X8FUTY6J3d6taJrjKgrJWZhmuXyS8 JTBAbmp9bL6EnIiNr36QWC3YlbBQAbbbC11lQuuTYykyLpIOdw5g4LpMp32q7ZFk7NFf rg/zOLRRA2gGd7FlppE+Guya/qgZFIze7ZB0Yk3GIu8xhSvIRpAziQZ+n8hdS8yTVKvE 4/xg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:subject:from; bh=0oWlIyBLHnaMiMIvJ47iEud6qTkdVz1elaq1ptoPXpE=; b=WIP13ach/WTeo2RgbcmV2aBN8yMIO8CSnBgnK/sEdKB4kNE0nQ5RjnDlsE5SyV5V75 kLnIb3i6+3XG9o9VLeq6N3wmJuA4Ijk5RcnQFLjeJcSO4Ky7y0IsUMnQ4epdMyek0aA6 4ZDvdfSiUTJ2xtKphT8PdcUIl9dmz7Be6Ov9Iust3wJljPPQLQEDzexUGSNb9UpLqqmI tclH8P8GdyTTy709Msw9UMyQBXdU7ikGwXTdBORhj8a3bKNlmBp09u+bNAQyEmYH+u1Z cpirCIJtOXZCMQ4zn5xHEw6X9vrAnuYQunwfu8en6X7iXtGJDTeaiJgyCjQT/DFi7eO+ ONLg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l4si1990072plh.292.2021.04.27.20.03.57; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235411AbhD1DEG (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 23:04:06 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59550 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230285AbhD1DEF (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 23:04:05 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC521FB; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.163.76.81] (unknown [10.163.76.81]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6B423F694; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:03:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Anshuman Khandual Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm/huge_memory.c: remove dedicated macro HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK To: Miaohe Lin , akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: ziy@nvidia.com, william.kucharski@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, rcampbell@nvidia.com, songliubraving@fb.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, riel@surriel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, minchan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20210427133214.2270207-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com> <20210427133214.2270207-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:34:06 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210427133214.2270207-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/27/21 7:02 PM, Miaohe Lin wrote: > Rewrite the pgoff checking logic to remove macro HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK > which is only used here to simplify the code. > > Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin > --- > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h > index 9626fda5efce..0a526f211fec 100644 > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h > @@ -152,15 +152,13 @@ static inline bool __transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma) > > bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma); > > -#define HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK (HPAGE_PMD_NR - 1) > - > static inline bool transhuge_vma_suitable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, > unsigned long haddr) > { > /* Don't have to check pgoff for anonymous vma */ > if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma)) { > - if (((vma->vm_start >> PAGE_SHIFT) & HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK) != > - (vma->vm_pgoff & HPAGE_CACHE_INDEX_MASK)) > + if (!IS_ALIGNED((vma->vm_start >> PAGE_SHIFT) - vma->vm_pgoff, > + HPAGE_PMD_NR)) > return false; > } > > LGTM Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual