Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp41957pxy; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:16:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVy8WXTssnICgrKrWO8KZl7+kGHOrqWk+QKOGrpt8e9f88l+S208TkDg/Y1kN+qEo9Q1My X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a505:: with SMTP id a5mr30617310pjq.58.1619587000021; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:16:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619587000; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Zv+Cb2CGt5Egcche5tDDsw4cxMrgjaM+Bb762E1Pa2OOKGUhbwKU9p4Zv3ACy3QKPF qT/PojzsSksph8AdrJ34ylzyjmu2aurGxy9Wt2e1BKic99amCxO1or6Kkl7qpAV0zqQB NrWsXKufa2fvHuccIUdfoYn2H6PRP/BHYULCf7LOZ7YuYsrQoOot978v96hATzT/mSnV 2FnK6ijYMtDSjJh2MsmA+ZIDZ/yCkyqiwdrkcVtEFc+C6mRGqjmki9gmjXA4SJitkTBq 1iyETtx2ap2zAxh+ooaBKjy/KmdQJkfBHtQ8AaxJvLxTxqtQnPKdatxC7W2g6OcZvt/C 7VFg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=0gJMy7DqAS1eYRTK9B131Vy4K+YMVwWNOR4yrE6X82I=; b=z7e+ycy2Q0sUfMNePHbzEsQ5tmXHsCl+CycFpKnZ42i+1yY2/e0wp3ZbkNAOG6++NW 2NjhWvrjKN3sQWeq6C6j6ekCHlbRgGFTNNTlKM3r0nx3VE8fa0Gjxtu2jEGOa+GRjs0i Smfp2clGU+YbVWecWXW0A6ZYU+8jfeoRHlKe2qLuZjTmzDk1todpWMFSNcjoDnXmt4S2 bnLxNzMw/DAlSoI/sVFCjDhjxRZre+ESpgRCBe0uQxcA25O3PjuaMv/tL4qqZoYvoq07 x2N82Y0WzBXBk7AfBRR2eSNFIvtqZVTWcZSLOTGPK3vBAx+vINCzoI30m3l3ah9ioJ22 7K6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@virtuozzo.com header.s=relay header.b=lvTFouv5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z17si2647650plg.432.2021.04.27.22.16.28; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 22:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@virtuozzo.com header.s=relay header.b=lvTFouv5; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232414AbhD1FQA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 01:16:00 -0400 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:35128 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229717AbhD1FQA (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 01:16:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtuozzo.com; s=relay; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: Subject; bh=0gJMy7DqAS1eYRTK9B131Vy4K+YMVwWNOR4yrE6X82I=; b=lvTFouv53BEh8mHyG NY7phcbGM0CieM5FyKUvFOhGkYhy9YpaXThdBSSwtS+55DAF1oe2Tf1w5GoChA6P4wWw8jBtBKm8H dNK0NijqbVaj0q9VRVxslSW4Cnu0YuCBEUgfpXxqTJh70FnrJu64+7td8LHRzhWHt8DC5+9slwvdc =; Received: from [10.93.0.56] by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lbcXW-001Vbz-HK; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:15:10 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipc: use kmalloc for msg_queue and shmid_kernel To: Michal Hocko Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Shakeel Butt , Johannes Weiner , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> References: From: Vasily Averin Message-ID: <70805e05-5e56-2ab9-2654-3d48e9fe5a0a@virtuozzo.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:15:10 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/26/21 1:25 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > Using kvmalloc for sub page size objects is suboptimal because kmalloc > can easily fallback into vmalloc under memory pressure and smaller > objects would fragment memory. Therefore replace kvmalloc by a simple > kmalloc. I think you're wrong here: kvmalloc can failback to vmalloc for size > PAGE_SIZE only Please take look at mm/util.c::kvmalloc_node() if (size > PAGE_SIZE) { kmalloc_flags |= __GFP_NOWARN; if (!(kmalloc_flags & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL)) kmalloc_flags |= __GFP_NORETRY; } ret = kmalloc_node(size, kmalloc_flags, node); /* * It doesn't really make sense to fallback to vmalloc for sub page * requests */ if (ret || size <= PAGE_SIZE) return ret; return __vmalloc_node(size, 1, flags, node, __builtin_return_address(0)); For small objects kvmalloc is not much different just from kmalloc, so the patch is mostly cosmetic.