Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: skakit=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:34:16 +0530
From:   skakit@codeaurora.org
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, kgunda@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Include PMIC DT
 files for sc7280
In-Reply-To: <YH8XIyp/l4C0JPvc@google.com>
References: <1618398783-7834-1-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
 <1618398783-7834-6-git-send-email-skakit@codeaurora.org>
 <YH8XIyp/l4C0JPvc@google.com>
Message-ID: <62b11bc7706d4d9e335f9f1cc09c98bc@codeaurora.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9
Precedence: bulk

On 2021-04-20 23:32, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:43:03PM +0530, satya priya wrote:
> 
>> Subject: arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Include PMIC DT files for sc7280
> 
> Please make sure to distinguish between the SoC (sc7280) and the
> board (sc7280-idp), this patch primarily adds stuff to the board not
> the SoC, this should be clear from the subject.
> 

Sure, will mention sc7280-idp in the subject.

>> Include pm7325, pm8350c, pmk8350 and pmr735a DT files.
> 
> How about something like 'The sc7280-idp has four PMICs, include their
> .dtsi files'?
> 

Okay.

>> Add channel nodes for pmk8350_vadc.
> 
> It's not super important, but I don't like it when things like this get
> sneaked in with a commit message saying 'Include PMIC DT files for
> sc7280'. I would suggest a separate patch. And please mention that
> the channels are for the on die temperatures of the PMICs.
> 

Okay, will make a separate patch for adding channel nodes.

>> Also, add the thermal_zones node in dtsi.
> 
> This is not the right patch to add it. This patch is about the 
> sc7280-board
> and doesn't do anything (directly) with thermal zones. However other
> patches further down in the stack of in this series require the
> 'thermal-zones' to exist, hence the node should exist before these 
> patches
> reference it. A dedicated patch adding the node seems like the best 
> option
> to me.

Okay, I will add a separate patch for adding thermal-zones node and 
place it in the beginning of the series.

Thanks,
Satya Priya