Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp261838pxy; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFO5uVOCeCe7ngzAK3dMnQlPAEIRbIGltaezIR9yQjeaN7zmxsMBV2efNMho1JxmKH7cPU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc90:: with SMTP id cs16mr27972011ejc.210.1619607357577; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619607357; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tZDc5LL0aRHcj5d4fLN91JSk+csvXzK4fRffv9bPgyVHXfE7ZdDgVR3Q7+tnDXEicN XjCqsWVkC+GO/BkjlvDHpMjJiMnnUYPy60V9CWt7ihtMonZiIpzeZHKf0NrHlMzIq64y zE3c74jHMSpZFGoCC1I2PmiZELfwGKOkECyYAl+bA6DHW+m6RWesq5iUMH45KfJ5EndP aK3g2c+2u4nTHBipra7zdwjufoVegsmz30GQ/9yj47hTvTxA381OzhMG6Sy4WjlM7CCD 77MbD0nBYyrakv3ZnHTcMgmoUZtBPkXCR2cGdpM+vA4215Ku9PICyDp8gHyzxkC3MzCw IRZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=i38qAydUV9D1OXWVf8wjL2KUV1llC+suuvz1DX0fuV4=; b=ls0oID0B+n+dOCjq9guknf4YOoHJuO7LZTE++0xbEM+aABjtaeigg9Y1TDUOVnkAZV 8vkRPG8e7oWnmLJ89gSh+JIGc1JMOxGoGNvvCKOAtbw1563o/XvD44CKkQA8oisjySRN 74J7hEXpNBu80f2IJsdCxE8M+9AFRiwNNv+SLN38Ic3CeNY1tx8VfpeUuC+C1yLZAt18 GE71YfhTOwZXKEyAPb+JeLINAJfvdrjjYl1M9lnYXFwTHnulQ4VVRUBT8l//8ewWMK2X fUzngV3zC4pKucGOPg/RD7ZcdLmPsBZ6IpY5tJeVl/Q4GBp8jvgk7PanK6/t+ejxJOEv GNwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=A0Q5tbMo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v24si5705359edy.243.2021.04.28.03.55.34; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=A0Q5tbMo; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239076AbhD1KEq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 06:04:46 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:45268 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238753AbhD1KEm (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 06:04:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1619604237; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i38qAydUV9D1OXWVf8wjL2KUV1llC+suuvz1DX0fuV4=; b=A0Q5tbMowMpvoK5X/U9jlm6ldlzeQYKACNDqm1cCglcEpxSXLdnCtzd/XnXBy+cYJR3UyN pdCpredFaS3Kfi+7M2NkP9x2TKjY/DTxHKLcVLm/nk2K0tm2fv7r5o4xLzYl9csegdhBra IpdYpS5sZQnIadusdchkZZSOi94cbSs= Received: from mail-ed1-f71.google.com (mail-ed1-f71.google.com [209.85.208.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-224-ThFquXMgOFqdyEQmjgKOcg-1; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 06:03:56 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ThFquXMgOFqdyEQmjgKOcg-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f71.google.com with SMTP id w14-20020aa7da4e0000b02903834aeed684so24777391eds.13 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:03:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i38qAydUV9D1OXWVf8wjL2KUV1llC+suuvz1DX0fuV4=; b=XK553/tM/7hoQtB7TTBHyvJI4/ZlIXPrJ5vYmb1iCPaKiWTu4AwxKQ7CdZS2++xEDW Xk+Okq5L7cXhzHXRel2f+eWEsimmdBJFsR5hqvdLeTGJ5PxLRC8nile58CAD9NFmRkCa EgBRV8DHZYAL7AthGh0dETIexHH0FNFpvra8dF1FK6JdOs5nrDA4Ujm6HQKkK65oeh/A /wVfUZhDcZV3gTxUuy86AeGXHsRuNzngWoNGM6ctNEkSw5FYImHO10fOpN9w19ohuAhv FYP+afcNdWRvuqhegwRPuuVZx4oTFcyiStgMqiH0O8zZQuZ2zX9S7MvIBDLzR6qFd0oi sjvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rxoOd1f6ouiRtaafrIFlcNcb6qxyOMdg/20944EPu4g4Cvg3l XraV+GHiNMGUM26kSdci/asZdCK/ln9ekXTddUt42OTz1CoPhZiE15GI/3Gt81idY9Eh6I8EisE R46WMcIKa/ZMUEm/nQxZTqQRr X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:52d7:: with SMTP id w23mr1364767ejn.451.1619604234830; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:03:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:52d7:: with SMTP id w23mr1364748ejn.451.1619604234686; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cm21sm4438901edb.29.2021.04.28.03.03.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 03:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps To: Ben Gardon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , Peter Shier , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong References: <20210427223635.2711774-1-bgardon@google.com> <20210427223635.2711774-7-bgardon@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1b598516-4478-4de2-4241-d4b517ec03fa@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:03:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210427223635.2711774-7-bgardon@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 28/04/21 00:36, Ben Gardon wrote: > -static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, > +static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm *kvm, > + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, > unsigned long npages) > { > int i; > @@ -10892,7 +10950,7 @@ static int kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata(struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, > */ > memset(&slot->arch, 0, sizeof(slot->arch)); > > - r = alloc_memslot_rmap(slot, npages); > + r = alloc_memslot_rmap(kvm, slot, npages); > if (r) > return r; > I wonder why you need alloc_memslot_rmap at all here in kvm_alloc_memslot_metadata, or alternatively why you need to do it in kvm_arch_assign_memslots. It seems like only one of those would be necessary. Paolo