Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:02:05 +0530
From:   B K Karthik <bkkarthik@pesu.pes.edu>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@gmail.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        skhan@linuxfoundation.org, kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: mark isapnp as obsolete
Message-ID: <20210428123205.nkxunwubdogjyvmq@burgerking>
References: <20210428110536.edy74gsobkgtd6al@ubuntu>
 <YIlCzOl/rkYeOWVW@kroah.com>
 <56ea648f-3742-6dd6-9deb-5f1ba441905f@perex.cz>
 <YIlT0KKfT6QaE8mz@unreal>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YIlT0KKfT6QaE8mz@unreal>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Precedence: bulk

On 21/04/28 03:23PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 02:17:00PM +0200, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> > Dne 28. 04. 21 v 13:11 Greg KH napsal(a):
> > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:35:36PM +0530, Anupama K Patil wrote:
> > >> isapnp code is very old and according to this link
> > >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_Plug_and_Play#Specifications
> > >> from Wikipedia, even Windows Vista disabled ISA PnP by default.
> > >>
> > >> This change is in follow up to
> > >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210422180322.7wlyg63kv3n2k6id@ubuntu/T/#u
> > >> and https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210424194301.jmsqpycvsm7izbk3@ubuntu/T/#u
> > >>
> > >> Suggested-by: B K Karthik <bkkarthik@pesu.pes.edu>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Anupama K Patil <anupamakpatil123@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > Has the maintainer said this is unsupported?
> > 
> > I've no idea, if there're any users at the time, but there are many drivers
> > which depend on this code.
> 
> IMHO, this is exactly "Odd fixes" - code not really dead, but not really
> alive too.

Okay! Does this have to come around as a v2 with 'Odd Fixes' instead of obsolete?
Or should that be a separate patch?

Or should we just wait for the maintainer's reply?
Sorry i'm a little confused.

thanks,

karthik

> 
> Thanks
> 
> > 
> > I'll try to reply to patch threads.
> > 
> > 						Jaroslav
> > 
> > -- 
> > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
> > Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.