Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp620794pxy; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnoY/qcHYXE0BqSP6ByLHSXwTMT6LPJX5SvRzryRipJ3sxh7dCmpFlMy5DjUEKhre/D8Ql X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1004:: with SMTP id c4mr12880524edu.364.1619631453251; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619631453; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zi4jxAaNeONGmKebUfv/D6zYMLC1ZamaPMte+315K+o0ToT7YZogTnBOTWuKuPtvQQ HpUEdA/kMqspso20CiLMxjLjG+kZ798itTpLg866Q5PMp/Fa5kDyxS4xOeRgies8RzQh DvpdsCNu4dmib+YA/sfHxcg/ZUW8RdPtTTkPMde54eepg1K2EJB4tUEV6XnXWdRFbX/g SgTEISEHBeD96xGwmuodNbDmNOpfBQm/4Z2gaUjrIDGMSN7FCKX8MW/9WqsamE39/3m4 ndRIUpJ8nSNyyqxhOj/tpHTkaB7RPDKAtgO6oMeQlSOmdgt3RM4AlbaGsjEWf1AQaoM0 Z8AQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:cc:to:from; bh=6rBLvHnKchIe+n1aLnDN7mMNOQs4N0Xz0RW4J0Ibul8=; b=uE8A1OgrAxMF6q2TNmWVuuQ8zJ1C5oGkugA08UgmKAGDxrIaz1uRdAYIxkwU5rc/TR aW3qeYtEVf73vm4IUWpEz62U2LM1Wj7tkqb5SnACwhB+NQX3KIXjWEpEiB0k+5KgpSGN wB5rnNyyj7psJa3n98iprh5CrN4j3B3lj8VD8367S3nFi/C72X943PzN6MRpyjJQP1Vx xjW7cdjEvDGEqr5OHz0ns7Gz8+Y7mypguMXkOLM8VdAobdt3ua4x31K2uTfi1prIzL8i HDF2C6XUPtekMy1uy69jAxtKCYWeVvqMjLmQ43rQVFgpbKpwLrdnEMnl1vFT0g5k55YM zm5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a6si566909ejg.52.2021.04.28.10.37.03; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 10:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239974AbhD1PgT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:36:19 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2944 "EHLO frasgout.his.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231169AbhD1PgQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:36:16 -0400 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.206]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FVjHL5d7mz6wkLW; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 23:29:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:35:28 +0200 Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:35:28 +0200 From: Roberto Sassu To: "zohar@linux.ibm.com" , "mjg59@google.com" CC: "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Casey Schaufler Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 04/11] ima: Move ima_reset_appraise_flags() call to post hooks Thread-Topic: [PATCH v4 04/11] ima: Move ima_reset_appraise_flags() call to post hooks Thread-Index: AQHXEdMA2oN9D131skWV9JJ8Z5VEUarKXeAg Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:35:28 +0000 Message-ID: <8e62ae3f8cf94c798fc1b7ffd69cbdc4@huawei.com> References: <20210305151923.29039-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> <20210305151923.29039-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20210305151923.29039-5-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.221.98.153] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Roberto Sassu > Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 4:19 PM > ima_inode_setxattr() and ima_inode_removexattr() hooks are called before > an > operation is performed. Thus, ima_reset_appraise_flags() should not be > called there, as flags might be unnecessarily reset if the operation is > denied. > > This patch introduces the post hooks ima_inode_post_setxattr() and > ima_inode_post_removexattr(), and adds the call to > ima_reset_appraise_flags() in the new functions. > > Cc: Casey Schaufler > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu > --- > fs/xattr.c | 2 ++ > include/linux/ima.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- > security/security.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/xattr.c b/fs/xattr.c > index b3444e06cded..81847f132d26 100644 > --- a/fs/xattr.c > +++ b/fs/xattr.c > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -502,6 +503,7 @@ __vfs_removexattr_locked(struct user_namespace > *mnt_userns, > > if (!error) { > fsnotify_xattr(dentry); > + ima_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name); > evm_inode_post_removexattr(dentry, name); > } > > diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h > index 61d5723ec303..5e059da43857 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ima.h > +++ b/include/linux/ima.h > @@ -171,7 +171,13 @@ extern void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct > user_namespace *mnt_userns, > struct dentry *dentry); > extern int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name, > const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len); > +extern void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, > + const char *xattr_name, > + const void *xattr_value, > + size_t xattr_value_len); > extern int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char > *xattr_name); > +extern void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, > + const char *xattr_name); > #else > static inline bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void) > { > @@ -192,11 +198,23 @@ static inline int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry > *dentry, > return 0; > } > > +static inline void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, > + const char *xattr_name, > + const void *xattr_value, > + size_t xattr_value_len) > +{ > +} > + > static inline int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, > const char *xattr_name) > { > return 0; > } > + > +static inline void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, > + const char *xattr_name) > +{ > +} > #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE */ > > #if defined(CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE) && > defined(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_TRUSTED_KEYRING) > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c > b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c > index 565e33ff19d0..1f029e4c8d7f 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c > @@ -577,21 +577,40 @@ int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const > char *xattr_name, > if (result == 1) { > if (!xattr_value_len || (xvalue->type >= IMA_XATTR_LAST)) > return -EINVAL; > - ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), > - xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); > result = 0; > } > return result; > } > > +void ima_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char > *xattr_name, > + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len) > +{ > + const struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xvalue = xattr_value; > + int result; > + > + result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value, > + xattr_value_len); > + if (result == 1) > + ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), I found an issue in this patch. Moving ima_reset_appraise_flags() to the post hook causes this function to be executed also when __vfs_setxattr_noperm() is called. The problem is that at the end of a write IMA calls ima_collect_measurement() to recalculate the file digest and update security.ima. ima_collect_measurement() sets IMA_COLLECTED. However, after that __vfs_setxattr_noperm() causes IMA_COLLECTED to be reset, and to unnecessarily recalculate the file digest. This wouldn't happen if ima_reset_appraise_flags() is in the pre hook. I solved by replacing: iint->flags &= ~IMA_DONE_MASK; with: iint->flags &= ~(IMA_DONE_MASK & ~IMA_COLLECTED); just when the IMA_CHANGE_XATTR bit is set. It should not be a problem since setting an xattr does not influence the file content. Mimi, what do you think? Thanks Roberto HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063 Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli > + xvalue->type == EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG); > +} > + > int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name) > { > int result; > > result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); > if (result == 1) { > - ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), 0); > result = 0; > } > return result; > } > + > +void ima_inode_post_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char > *xattr_name) > +{ > + int result; > + > + result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0); > + if (result == 1) > + ima_reset_appraise_flags(d_backing_inode(dentry), 0); > +} > diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c > index 5ac96b16f8fa..efb1f874dc41 100644 > --- a/security/security.c > +++ b/security/security.c > @@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ void security_inode_post_setxattr(struct dentry > *dentry, const char *name, > if (unlikely(IS_PRIVATE(d_backing_inode(dentry)))) > return; > call_void_hook(inode_post_setxattr, dentry, name, value, size, flags); > + ima_inode_post_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size); > evm_inode_post_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size); > } > > -- > 2.26.2