Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp974443pxy; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3dAnjje2oKnRu6gD0kbskXJRTcQP3uopWE5vX0Aq+oXp22lPSd7Twc7FOE/SULsrhD58N X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1a47:: with SMTP id bf7mr15346199edb.173.1619661883181; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619661883; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=maqDnt3fCK/ET78bjUqL2yg5UqJwnicAYnTLfACcOAg9sYtDEe9aBe5vVjqHFe1vs0 VvJM5RDjTaFybqUMCmpR/2fMuLscWdndwsobAHSn3fL9JNk2Bj6P3BKQnDhkAuVgPmnJ ddx01MG2B0xuEcidBI6PYK51TGT/cMwuDqeXHPxnWnTdQvsnu4hUIaw0OQgyJloQkVUt g6H+C6hmRxQ3HLJGs4uDyucweYvcL6P8gdvxdWwZ/c5ZMwbeldFuBEvP5ihSDTiEJxCi 83c+BNpQG3IYRp03n+pT0/DEMeqZPDHmUgNIcMlPeuZUq5jWM/LBoXkPso1joC+pr9Es 9VWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=+BkPf6ouH7ZXKDiYFqOTfX8y6jRjgrxp2WW9zPHG2zM=; b=VXNlLFnm/uFXFKq2UnYFENnnt/e4+eP9Xa8svQOOYfyEvd4rYdr+zp/ye8wzvnPdli kE/TOZTWEGKuepuWqSDoNHBAswNL3q9NfFAgBs0GUiY9bR/73ogRf21lQok6HtLaFC5e fg4x3okLPXLdm/81+t8qdZljn5eWodgYyvTmEmiDTD0VFoTrB22eOYBtgmSdYq+acbUQ ga8AbrbzaXLQ8q5FCCsRG5K3i5hn/TnC/9EGXNU4TF5BGzQYnfeRSp5JIw2fn15kYb50 SB1thhAknlDyEX6mPgxUByzFOvGmWuPTFWvF5CF27i3sm7gb8xphVBPKJrJAmI9HihCT GRHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bkM3ihNe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l3si1927528ejd.313.2021.04.28.19.04.18; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bkM3ihNe; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234674AbhD2CEP (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:04:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45664 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229888AbhD2CEO (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:04:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 846AEC06138B; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id x54-20020a05683040b6b02902a527443e2fso9054140ott.1; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+BkPf6ouH7ZXKDiYFqOTfX8y6jRjgrxp2WW9zPHG2zM=; b=bkM3ihNeJ0HW0mwEhAryX/7RY+zSFEiCvJZ+gRl5PCNaIWoBzeHbMJhZiX2JleCqFx HLNTKqeM8OY8uIxF8eC8DT7mVkA1iUEaNmHvfekXAfP17uNorz2h/jIY7Gu+LX4/Y2sl z3n7dwLFasEJJCChT8MptcwyeFTF/Yxw3X0vJ3SoRiFGI6oNZA/4GuLwz7YvCNoOqC3t Oi1fe+2Bqa2kHo8xEJjBuisMEFZJfLfSjPyt4JaoCymoVOjNmpSIlIUmR739KLfHNGmg dZ2RYKJ7OCK8mcRsu5D48S2iI2L+ZoNxyfFObXATtJUEr13ucFaPxfZtH9kit5zH/1Xw UEyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+BkPf6ouH7ZXKDiYFqOTfX8y6jRjgrxp2WW9zPHG2zM=; b=A+rncepdDwUWBm+21B6mhL44pFyT84qxhYCN5+ag6y9ruETwmBz8VgI3XhoBleNEye DL0cK2l90XcXZfFIPfobgq3wje9X+tWBBco7xKtwNpP4/o8ndNGVJxCVlKJgfZ8V8TGV l8rKhWzNyeXdliO3HzJTLbFqsoz4u2k5LieoqmtQePI6NPurC21KUN6feX2h7uH8c972 C1Ya/OXfaZKNXVZes1JlwVLzprmwAT04IKfiX0MHBg9EJweSzGxGHnfuA3Y/4qGaAlx6 3/yPdd0j3ZyiRun/MaJ0R3aOCZdmH/J1cMg3PGw2oc9gXZJ+kGM/7+Zl2rDd+X/QIahn Zsrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533wcSkeERZLXJyvp6JsYsNVmgLtPCeHiJmRMX106ecrJBEXk+Vl HxsCF6i4B7zgyvNC1WxNcB8= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6a88:: with SMTP id l8mr16463342otq.236.1619661806887; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Davids-MacBook-Pro.local ([8.48.134.33]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f20sm413214oov.21.2021.04.28.19.03.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [net-next] seg6: add counters support for SRv6 Behaviors To: Andrea Mayer , "David S. Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stefano Salsano , Paolo Lungaroni , Ahmed Abdelsalam References: <20210427154404.20546-1-andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it> From: David Ahern Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:03:23 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210427154404.20546-1-andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/27/21 9:44 AM, Andrea Mayer wrote: > This patch provides counters for SRv6 Behaviors as defined in [1], > section 6. For each SRv6 Behavior instance, counters defined in [1] are: > > - the total number of packets that have been correctly processed; > - the total amount of traffic in bytes of all packets that have been > correctly processed; > ... > > Results of tests are shown in the following table: > > Scenario (1): average 1504764,81 pps (~1504,76 kpps); std. dev 3956,82 pps > Scenario (2): average 1501469,78 pps (~1501,47 kpps); std. dev 2979,85 pps > Scenario (3): average 1501315,13 pps (~1501,32 kpps); std. dev 2956,00 pps > > As can be observed, throughputs achieved in scenarios (2),(3) did not > suffer any observable degradation compared to scenario (1). > > Thanks to Jakub Kicinski and David Ahern for their valuable suggestions > and comments provided during the discussion of the proposed RFCs. > > [2] https://www.cloudlab.us > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Mayer > --- > include/uapi/linux/seg6_local.h | 30 +++++ > net/ipv6/seg6_local.c | 198 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for the detailed commit message and stats on performance impact. > @@ -977,7 +1044,14 @@ static int seg6_local_input(struct sk_buff *skb) > slwt = seg6_local_lwtunnel(orig_dst->lwtstate); > desc = slwt->desc; > > - return desc->input(skb, slwt); > + rc = desc->input(skb, slwt); > + > + if (!seg6_lwtunnel_counters_enabled(slwt)) > + return rc; > + > + seg6_local_update_counters(slwt, len, rc); > + > + return rc; Nit: This would be simpler as if (seg6_lwtunnel_counters_enabled(slwt)) seg6_local_update_counters(slwt, len, rc); return rc; but not worth a re-do since net-next is about to close, so: Reviewed-by: David Ahern