Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210424021631.1972022-1-rajatja@google.com> <20210424021631.1972022-2-rajatja@google.com>
 <d53c72949d81db9f092a9aecb49bf56b47727738.camel@suse.com> <CAJZ5v0iNrSFjhmTE8K-JrO07kJon3ikhatbg0Jg2hs+x-frDJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <79b994f2476249498797e1784f735fd7@AcuMS.aculab.com> <21c6b5002c5ad36cd7fe0bb849f5eba12a614bca.camel@suse.com>
 <b5e031652f144ab6accbe553566676c9@AcuMS.aculab.com> <0601e45130495b152bec04eee4a50e302db4cfd2.camel@suse.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jEbjRSGPdfwvegawin5_N=m-UoP+Wa99EQ-QmkusiBCg@mail.gmail.com> <5ac7634acbe7569879234ad541879c79918f3e00.camel@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ac7634acbe7569879234ad541879c79918f3e00.camel@suse.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:57:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jF1M95MJO+gGL2rmk=rmt5u0sYR-DCJW4+Bb5WP+3W7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] pci: Support "removable" attribute for PCI devices
To:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:" 
        <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>,
        Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@google.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:03 AM Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.04.2021, 14:21 +0200 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:
>
> > In principle, in the wake of Thunderbolt every PCI driver handling
> > PCIe devices needs to be able to deal with a device that's gone away
> > without notice, because in principle any PCIe device can be included
> > into a Thunderbolt docking station which may go away as a whole
> > without notice.
>
> Yes, but we are dealing with what we export to user space, don't we?

Right, so it would be good to know why exporting this information to
user space is desired.