Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86: add MSR_KVM_MIGRATION_CONTROL
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        Venu Busireddy <venu.busireddy@oracle.com>
References: <20210421173716.1577745-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
 <20210421173716.1577745-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> <YIiMrWS60NuesU63@google.com>
 <CABayD+dKLTx5kQTaKASQkcam4OiHJueuL1Vf32soiLq=torg+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <YInAT6MYU2N0tKSW@google.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <cc0c6333-6c2f-e8f3-f838-3cb2492f007a@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:09:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YInAT6MYU2N0tKSW@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 28/04/21 22:06, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> But there's only multiple meanings if we define the bit to be specific to
> page encryption.  E.g. if the bit is KVM_READY_FOR_MIGRATION, then its meaning
> (when cleared) is simply "please don't migrate me, I will die".  KVM doesn't
> care_why_  the guest is telling userspace that it's not ready for migration, nor
> does KVM care if userspace honors the indicator.

Makes sense, I'll change that.

Paolo