Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp1521587pxy; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:43:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9TeBgogXMGVbDwkWvl7j1uwtTF+aZgw86uBDDmWCvh3S4MN+ebkB3VH6NBxGQ4sZgxTL8 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:278d:: with SMTP id b13mr253553ede.34.1619710982338; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:43:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619710982; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BbcHQOZW9OLkoT9ioUES1DAW58q21Vx2SC57aUbYrZNXDj5FuuNZZ22JotqiuYoAMk T3AObMqj0WXVy9Dn24qSMbxm+sFN4Hj1BmC2WW+Y7gpjc0iIBjujIGMLRv8D3otuUc+p D44zydEMAZoV+/UDmdkN3auvpN1w4UxJs5raG1Dgy1FawgxrM4Al66mPCkd/vYWNs0x3 G06UQHldT2Xjl4sTDEfBpvJUTtALUWDa6h5/hgVGlQlKeRwr0FK5GFIxIKs/15WsOCmV 0JXgaoBy6M08bRG1T6w2Y+7XkcBzSgXP0heVepkQBcxuzCrgbUUkCaskMutm+4Ce5xdW jkkQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=BQbkytA+PXtTY5YfGP8M5DIYUuBz3K7V5eP2VQDmhNM=; b=HSs7ZyoN+pzCZ6XDelMt6I9tJCU3yU8pomKhC/nWJWHG/NYz4Je6rq0jlUP0ktwYyJ 6Z5f1G67nfkUexWIxn3W2yT3px2urqh0A5VaNvRek2u71S4v0FohOc7/KY/zaUehpw5N fKLmxohEzFx2dNyqpo12xMzq/sP7WGxd6RUHTRzN55F7n7NmBSJMB636wWKbfF7LhgDM r+tl7ceNBrM0kCb0BLZXP6ULr12R3iHV1plnF5JWopMnFDPoxl9wFcju2jB0pFg9ln6W q8t+Ga4qh73HGs1/OM/S78Qdw0HgRGZeqVy/qjAQDW+i/rNCDuB8RL7hF8yQyEXtzKBs UV3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2020-01-29 header.b=S9FvGfcc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z16si3236325edc.65.2021.04.29.08.42.37; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@oracle.com header.s=corp-2020-01-29 header.b=S9FvGfcc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=oracle.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240734AbhD2PlV (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:41:21 -0400 Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:43136 "EHLO userp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240646AbhD2PlP (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:41:15 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 13TFKUW4076424; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:12 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=BQbkytA+PXtTY5YfGP8M5DIYUuBz3K7V5eP2VQDmhNM=; b=S9FvGfccgLwiYVaHfVT6jvYI9xpZP3PWhPZeOaPVxfS3KNgYbpuPJI2hbw3XraqSnlyZ 505RkaClU9/iT4OKzTQ+bczYv+vuWzeaRFjuhq2fmVFED06dzd/eeSqY9SuPEFcM/3MS ERuk9MX5h8FdEkgC/Kr+/xCjP9neVJ77JuoK5y731Wr7wGmQsr2F4kEAXslZKd76GOSp 9MvMREJ777cCo/B9Mf3X/o1koMgac30wg/QmrFyrwm+ecG4h0NZgIwNU+0JVm+LiECek pktom7ZUB3L7zljVNBR46D79YXmni3Rp6+sgziRygTzJE1IWbuuyhZG6ln3IogIs75HN Hg== Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 385aeq4uva-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:12 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 13TFEule086153; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:11 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3874d3pt3x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:11 +0000 Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 13TFYBrO173166; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:10 GMT Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 3874d3pt3a-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:10 +0000 Received: from abhmp0007.oracle.com (abhmp0007.oracle.com [141.146.116.13]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 13TFe9MK014179; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:40:09 GMT Received: from kadam (/102.36.221.92) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 08:40:08 -0700 Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:40:02 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Phil Reid , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] staging: fbtft: Don't spam logs when probe is deferred Message-ID: <20210429154002.GF21598@kadam> References: <20210428130415.55406-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20210428130415.55406-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20210429144244.GE1981@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210429144244.GE1981@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: rKOQ23DLMGvFxRqmwpwTIydtrzopqg3E X-Proofpoint-GUID: rKOQ23DLMGvFxRqmwpwTIydtrzopqg3E X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6200 definitions=9969 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2104290097 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:42:44PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 04:04:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > @@ -75,20 +75,16 @@ static int fbtft_request_one_gpio(struct fbtft_par *par, > > struct gpio_desc **gpiop) > > { > > struct device *dev = par->info->device; > > - int ret = 0; > > > > *gpiop = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, name, index, > > GPIOD_OUT_LOW); > > - if (IS_ERR(*gpiop)) { > > - ret = PTR_ERR(*gpiop); > > - dev_err(dev, > > - "Failed to request %s GPIO: %d\n", name, ret); > > - return ret; > > - } > > + if (IS_ERR(*gpiop)) > > + dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(*gpiop), "Failed to request %s GPIO\n", name); > > This should be a return statement: > > return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(*gpiop), "Failed to request %s GPIO\n", name); > I've created a new Smatch check for these: drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-core.c:2890 mcp251xfd_probe() warn: pointer error 'PTR_ERR(clk)' not handled There aren't that many bugs... Anyway, I'm running a test now and I guess we'll see tomorrow how it goes. regards, dan carpenter