Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992512AbWJTG3K (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:29:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992516AbWJTG3K (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:29:10 -0400 Received: from mailer.campus.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.4]:8685 "EHLO mailer.campus.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992513AbWJTG3H (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:29:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:30:04 +0400 Message-Id: <200610200630.k9K6U4RU031798@vass.7ka.mipt.ru> From: Vasily Tarasov To: Andi Kleen CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List CC: Andrew Morton CC: Jan Kara CC: Dmitry Mishin CC: Vasily Averin CC: Kirill Korotaev CC: OpenVZ Developers List References: <200610191232.k9JCW7CF015486@vass.7ka.mipt.ru> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.5 (mailer.campus.mipt.ru [194.85.82.4]); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:28:32 +0400 (MSD) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 815 Lines: 23 Andi Kleen wrote: > Thanks. But the code should be probably common somewhere in fs/*, not > duplicated. Thank you for the comment! I'm not sure we should do it. If we move the code in fs/quota.c for example, than this code will be compiled for _all_ arhitectures, not only for x86_64 and ia64. Of course, we can surround this code by #ifdefs , but I thought this is a bad style... Moreover looking through current kernel code, I found out that usually code is duplicated in such cases. However, if you insist I'll modify the code! :) Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/