Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a841:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d1csp1919159pxy; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:30:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5lTjeS4uFA27uxKj4M2YXRzm/S107aj0LroClvqxfNNa8JYgp7lReiQ6U+qvITPj3yPif X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a08:b029:ec:bef1:4ea1 with SMTP id v8-20020a1709029a08b02900ecbef14ea1mr2648925plp.78.1619746213191; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:30:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619746213; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uFwqOR6AOmH4SWDPLxqNUczJ4WDNrpd3g4/2YsmItbIWykX71ENkFD4MUjenYL7wi/ Xr90brO948/1+bWp8r6rJ5FmJOjA4ZTLaD7uXuCYwGfQbnjuPiEeIzORN4K3vNxoOpv1 dNAR355ScPSQlMOGKizK3IguAPg7pZj1KggVb0PImuAUePSFEWuVn0RBvQ76HVwMPK/N kTL/fmNzHpx43QIavWgXDRF6/oddOz+eAhbTyQyUaoWVeGGMQbudaaLZa5HV37pwi9vu Ed5g96l1P/b52zPwqTC3WNuWPylkKsZFiz+fKu1A9bGzJo1UpJ6+IxVAcmTFelvdlZbe 1URg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=V1QnMHl1bv4GYjD2nKUUJjqSbgwtkE7PlJ3sqyWNs7Y=; b=wLPG84e/WpncibmD/j2GWGQueCT7F9DfwxHl/73l14hBheNQ1bQrwcNitlYnqof6Xh bbOdkTA8M5rUxUDbrTk0Z9Js60macBXNTPXVAvIX6grxv0eh/Vt+d5vQbGxFUkZQlLPH oEQ9DUOlUNbbBPyoYsHFsiJuk+29nedFnlNK4KuYpTL8hYQsh2KE60fRrwKW6Qdgb/Ns 1nrlAGgBIjpUTcaOANxdp2+K8p2BOZYRdig8VcIvgLk+OZLVjWxURf+JW0sPZ/r/BiBB JiA3h/LEhpH7wp/gRuYpclrlUl7JFwvWMxe/peEKw1JcJ9aBd+jnfrW/bLufqnbIkL+g k8FQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=PtHlsQZO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q21si387569pfc.202.2021.04.29.18.28.43; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=PtHlsQZO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229844AbhD3B0G (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:26:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44328 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229582AbhD3B0G (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:26:06 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc34.google.com (mail-oo1-xc34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42DFC06138B for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id u48-20020a4a97330000b02901fa060b8066so428624ooi.8 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:25:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V1QnMHl1bv4GYjD2nKUUJjqSbgwtkE7PlJ3sqyWNs7Y=; b=PtHlsQZOZ+E4ykn+R3l13RBajbWKW9bc5n0CxdJOHTPMz4PSUer/AJh9vCysr5UYOv SuCTrQprrgY+vi68vThE0YH88YfY2vB8BtuvkvLHFzNcfsD3Qo++eWfTMmQBN66+qcZx YA3c9pl9Lat5hMK3NWhl/lTgmlPl8zmEwFMKU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V1QnMHl1bv4GYjD2nKUUJjqSbgwtkE7PlJ3sqyWNs7Y=; b=Heys2vRbcKARvUeoM9/udEYWn3xGLbxcj6STLUWvZjB3QWcN2N7JTc2vMQ8IZpRxln 84s/cxe2mySZ+gZkFiYelmekq54WOXnY0XFUuVILMtm4TScACC0/ALHM1e82IQO5oZ+i gqKPcVH45IKLDe4yErpsHhWoc7NnThsVUpNUgGeHcusG1XJcAqS9I6KX4l8EB53h+/fG y1wxMR+aBncVwxlO6PdkAn8iINIUBs1rIngzEhcp9Rdn+rMqBoJt2N3Y1QfG6I0VXUAJ WDvoZBWyIlwIif7bRHBYANloUDLEbYrJeNUtKevXbCSnGB69VepYYpdYxxcaNoNZutOF BfTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308HiRpNwTfytoEXwoUMlNHMEFe4JgbFtmbPGGP0AU8SqH+/+gl bNrpEEpajMdpvUscncUZvTZBh9nVegx6vg== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:e386:: with SMTP id l6mr2249671oov.81.1619745917921; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com (mail-ot1-f43.google.com. [209.85.210.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l7sm359977oov.5.2021.04.29.18.25.17 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id v23-20020a9d60570000b02902a53bac99a3so8344669otj.5 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:25:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:80d4:: with SMTP id c20mr3510159ybm.345.1619745906527; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:25:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210423165906.2504169-1-dianders@chromium.org> <20210423095743.v5.1.I9e6af2529d6c61e5daf86a15a1211121c5223b9a@changeid> In-Reply-To: From: Doug Anderson Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 18:24:55 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/20] drm/panel: panel-simple: Add missing pm_runtime_disable() calls To: Linus Walleij Cc: Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Sam Ravnborg , Wolfram Sang , MSM , Rob Clark , Stanislav Lisovskiy , Stephen Boyd , Steev Klimaszewski , Maarten Lankhorst , linux-i2c , Bjorn Andersson , "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Thierry Reding , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 5:58 PM Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:59 PM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > In commit 3235b0f20a0a ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to > > avoid excessive unprepare / prepare") we started using pm_runtime, but > > my patch neglected to add the proper pm_runtime_disable(). Doh! Add > > them now. > > > > Fixes: 3235b0f20a0a ("drm/panel: panel-simple: Use runtime pm to avoid excessive unprepare / prepare") > > Reported-by: Bjorn Andersson > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson > > This patch as such: > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > Notice however: you turn on pm runtime pm_runtime_enable() > in panel_simple_probe() but are you ever turning it off in > panel_simple_remove()? > > I think pm_runtime_disable(); need to be added there? I'm a bit confused. You're saying that I need to add pm_runtime_disable() to panel_simple_remove()? Doesn't this patch do that? This patch adds two calls to pm_runtime_disable(). One of those is in the probe error path and the other one is in panel_simple_remove(). -Doug