Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp104422pxy; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:08:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzu2ec39Wlx6kcDLDoFdFtrBHqJnfwy3kS145XnAmOijtFJ3im8c1pkQa0BvlZda6bLv7YP X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:484:: with SMTP id k4mr4148265edv.321.1619770098619; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:08:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619770098; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uPqIIa20s1yDDBqkR7bz0nvtlVq5KCawyJ5GS3YX63+TiTTDaQ7M4XP3aibXpJFnmB HX1c9Tcv6FFP1ikw3w3tNJBMbZrfK6iE/W4NlesTfco3fdSA7wi8spqvNqaRSTwJ55h3 Tv70Lqemk9QcYSAqf1mAKW25ZM1toPqMsGeOgA1/jGIs+/idQMEQxHW68i18rU7ozQKh sUGuoAcqCExMdN2Im25eJ/q+/zPX+0vvUW95AkaLOxKXU+jSBOm0kAS2efl9io9SLZ1O rxBJmsEr8MOiU9M96kQeMRGTGomZ8yP/Q6UAVBKkWoTVyC32yL9mk92CdJIukKGXaMRF 49qg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=7Lgu7GZuwf2ShM52IMPZQUuZHlh2sBzFCkGvpQ9gVhY=; b=drzGTcBtnik0aoPthmnZ4cVJ1MzgNUTYEu3MkOYnAECa47tEFE6AFt9IDj4eHBzpq4 swgs+WR+Wm7vIuy6s2gZ2BkeoLIGpzcY/d0enmgl2nyUVuhRDgDjj1TAuvci9grwrhSO rbn/Gaa9TJ4czpn8gmUXSh0B+2zGzos5v84nigCIzm4pdVkEQA3x3zsxOF/UvVstTJq4 3clrMaMR8VPG+Gumu3b/FocgajH5JoLBRdcXQVi34J1zQPsGYxnmjZY/g7t/u9b5McgB kkB+Pv0zGOyK/9QdmTEkOnc/Uqc13Nk7IzS0k/mgcXzA02GvIFRm4dnwiRSygMyyimLj SF5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=WyLOyP92; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q6si2686388ejn.673.2021.04.30.01.07.53; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 01:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=WyLOyP92; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229567AbhD3IHl (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:07:41 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:54448 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229532AbhD3IHk (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 04:07:40 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B29D861186; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:06:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1619770012; bh=WwcaFyczo1H0haJlGIG06rvrYQmQEvklII1MuwRovvY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WyLOyP92lS2p2AT5P++VJHVeW1p29hiOO0GBK1Q9BQskN8mY6dfKqjzi7Jq5qTFiJ I2lQufVkFEMoNBeF65vgo+IWKQQYzRsU62+qre0XcBEYHIaOXewKP7NHsrTET7LOSL NugoPn86rn6DKxrdZcC9My2tRDcizjucFqF0/AwQ= Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:06:49 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Du Cheng Cc: Kangjie Lu , "David S . Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH 169/190] Revert "atl1e: checking the status of atl1e_write_phy_reg" Message-ID: References: <20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> <20210421130105.1226686-170-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:13:25PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:00:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This reverts commit ff07d48d7bc0974d4f96a85a4df14564fb09f1ef. > > > > Commits from @umn.edu addresses have been found to be submitted in "bad > > faith" to try to test the kernel community's ability to review "known > > malicious" changes. The result of these submissions can be found in a > > paper published at the 42nd IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy > > entitled, "Open Source Insecurity: Stealthily Introducing > > Vulnerabilities via Hypocrite Commits" written by Qiushi Wu (University > > of Minnesota) and Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota). > > > > Because of this, all submissions from this group must be reverted from > > the kernel tree and will need to be re-reviewed again to determine if > > they actually are a valid fix. Until that work is complete, remove this > > change to ensure that no problems are being introduced into the > > codebase. > > > > Cc: Kangjie Lu > > Cc: David S. Miller > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c > > index ff9f96de74b8..85f9cb769e30 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/atheros/atl1e/atl1e_main.c > > @@ -455,9 +455,7 @@ static void atl1e_mdio_write(struct net_device *netdev, int phy_id, > > { > > struct atl1e_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); > > > > - if (atl1e_write_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, > > - reg_num & MDIO_REG_ADDR_MASK, val)) > > - netdev_err(netdev, "write phy register failed\n"); > > + atl1e_write_phy_reg(&adapter->hw, reg_num & MDIO_REG_ADDR_MASK, val); > > } > > > > static int atl1e_mii_ioctl(struct net_device *netdev, > > -- > > 2.31.1 > > > > The original change here is a mess, what is a user supposed to do if > this call fails? I will revert it and properly pass the error value up > to the callers, as that is the correct thing to do here, not paper over > the issue with a commit message that claims this change "fixes" > anything. In looking at this further, Du has pointed out to me that the atl1e_mdio_write function can not easily be changed to return an error value, because that would require all callbacks for mdio_write in struct mii_if_info would need to be changed and handled properly. So the original commit was as correct as is possible at the moment, making a much larger change like this really isn't needed, so I'll drop the revert. thanks to Du Cheng for the additional review, it is much appreciated. greg k-h