Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:54:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Frank Wunderlich <linux@fw-web.de>
Cc:     linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
        Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] musb: mediatek: rename driver
Message-ID: <YIv969BCnPgXzrcg@kroah.com>
References: <20210430124317.97376-1-linux@fw-web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210430124317.97376-1-linux@fw-web.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:43:17PM +0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
> 
> currently unspecific mediatek.ko is built,
> change this by adding subsystem

I am sorry, I do not understand this changelog text.  What are you doing
here and why?

> Signed-off-by: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/musb/Makefile                   | 2 +-
>  drivers/usb/musb/{mediatek.c => musb_mtk.c} | 0

Why rename this file, will that not break existing setups that expect
the module to be named this?

thanks,

greg k-h