Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp779873pxy; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:44:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybUWMSB3LrKIpkFgXoKUy/kYt5S7aB/beaGZJ52YN8J4OrcZ0TlVb/TiAmdnSdE7zBILxS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b7d3:: with SMTP id fy19mr6826889ejb.269.1619826292821; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:44:52 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1619826292; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=R7Cy0spK13dI1WV81RnRCjIZvQJtG2TT8E66fsWGkhlkA838aVwx3dxirAWDA1pTee XkA5um2feDu9LeMfxidZRwOKM5j9/83bN1vAwPl8uzHJJ30HKVpUQ1hio6c7iyOtXpIA mcFehEf3ayups/8Y6UXA5DdSxKpBfZSAsSkI0KZIvzTRTcXWV4/Flty9IhjDF8WGgObt yQPA4BJoSug6GPCYqK15zv3q7jUUf+6xX8Sq5VeBhO350fv/hUkGHU1T+BCqbymGUeFB HKyYUbRVfRMBzOx8VlLcBe06YG5E6op8qXOq3FJS6P26Zq36j6fo0e69wWRA+6XzNZXX pDOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:cc:to:from; bh=V1UEcC4GKwMn/io4hUsM78fMaB+9Zq5s8yDXXuEz0PU=; b=dZPzPnoLKNQRVBqSDJFI12NG/tLVhPG1B5+cpVggZcMWIbOoSyw/uRQay7gQREF+JC KPmS+aXgbp1tzd8OL0FeHj782WM+HzoTspsZjxuwiS/uGUqMGZaKyheFWJsmek3bYjJ9 32tXcT1CNpLe6/DTTH4BMtXMrQQcxwzhz1yhiTQ+67F6NOYJ9shmZmzu79bMWmKnPsfu sOGiABTwUXZA33KWwi+cGhl1O7HNrXH1LGF+C0xLHusR2Q5mauaCn6j9sqeLb4eekiRW 5h5owids/T498PsECyEEeq7xtjfyp/zBKttUuPADxQccK6dzEUcwWGbzI1F5iVaDL6j8 QWtw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n17si4684450ejs.363.2021.04.30.16.44.29; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232964AbhD3XoR (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:44:17 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:39932 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230508AbhD3XoQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:44:16 -0400 Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1lccn9-00Cty4-Kg; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:43:27 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=fess.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1lccn6-0000UE-Es; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:43:26 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Marco Elver Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Florian Weimer , "David S. Miller" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Collingbourne , Dmitry Vyukov , Alexander Potapenko , sparclinux , linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux API , kasan-dev References: Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 18:43:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:49:45 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1lccn6-0000UE-Es;;;mid=;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+W2OA1W2SlAwE5XeYrhZGR3rJ/oNhsGXY= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TooManySym_01,XMNoVowels,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4178] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 XMNoVowels Alpha-numberic number with no vowels * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Marco Elver X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1450 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 10 (0.7%), parse: 1.04 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 12 (0.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.66 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 13 (0.9%), tests_pri_-950: 1.32 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.09 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 106 (7.3%), check_bayes: 105 (7.2%), b_tokenize: 9 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (0.5%), b_comp_prob: 1.97 (0.1%), b_tok_touch_all: 83 (5.7%), b_finish: 0.83 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 1292 (89.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.61 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.2%), poll_dns_idle: 0.99 (0.1%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.2%), tests_pri_500: 7 (0.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [PATCH 6/3] signal: Factor force_sig_perf out of perf_sigtrap X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Separate generating the signal from deciding it needs to be sent. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- include/linux/sched/signal.h | 1 + kernel/events/core.c | 11 ++--------- kernel/signal.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h index 7daa425f3055..1e2f61a1a512 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ int send_sig_mceerr(int code, void __user *, short, struct task_struct *); int force_sig_bnderr(void __user *addr, void __user *lower, void __user *upper); int force_sig_pkuerr(void __user *addr, u32 pkey); +int force_sig_perf(void __user *addr, u32 type, u64 sig_data); int force_sig_fault_trapno(int sig, int code, void __user *addr, int trapno); int send_sig_fault_trapno(int sig, int code, void __user *addr, int trapno, diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index 928b166d888e..48ea8863183b 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -6394,8 +6394,6 @@ void perf_event_wakeup(struct perf_event *event) static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_event *event) { - struct kernel_siginfo info; - /* * We'd expect this to only occur if the irq_work is delayed and either * ctx->task or current has changed in the meantime. This can be the @@ -6410,13 +6408,8 @@ static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_event *event) if (current->flags & PF_EXITING) return; - clear_siginfo(&info); - info.si_signo = SIGTRAP; - info.si_code = TRAP_PERF; - info.si_errno = event->attr.type; - info.si_perf = event->attr.sig_data; - info.si_addr = (void __user *)event->pending_addr; - force_sig_info(&info); + force_sig_perf((void __user *)event->pending_addr, + event->attr.type, event->attr.sig_data); } static void perf_pending_event_disable(struct perf_event *event) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 690921960d8b..5b1ad7f080ab 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1753,6 +1753,19 @@ int force_sig_pkuerr(void __user *addr, u32 pkey) } #endif +int force_sig_perf(void __user *pending_addr, u32 type, u64 sig_data) +{ + struct kernel_siginfo info; + + clear_siginfo(&info); + info.si_signo = SIGTRAP; + info.si_errno = type; + info.si_code = TRAP_PERF; + info.si_addr = pending_addr; + info.si_perf = sig_data; + return force_sig_info(&info); +} + #if IS_ENABLED(SPARC) int force_sig_fault_trapno(int sig, int code, void __user *addr, int trapno) { -- 2.30.1