Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 30 Apr 2021 23:13:35 -0700
From:   Michel Lespinasse <michel@lespinasse.org>
To:     Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc:     "maple-tree@lists.infradead.org" <maple-tree@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken.cr@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 94/94] mm: Move mas locking outside of munmap() path.
Message-ID: <20210501061335.GD5188@lespinasse.org>
References: <20210428153542.2814175-1-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
 <20210428153542.2814175-95-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210428153542.2814175-95-Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 03:36:32PM +0000, Liam Howlett wrote:
> Now that there is a split variant that allows splitting to use a maple state,
> move the locks to a more logical position.

In this patch set, is the maple tree lock ever held outside of code
sections already protected by the mmap write lock ?

--
Michel "walken" Lespinasse