Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp2293014pxy; Sun, 2 May 2021 17:59:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXhgiAY9g1gUNRw2mwT6iqPhvNrvITSWzjFV4TWGY76mVVbACkj6HP98IXoNwJNQN4/E1b X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b292:: with SMTP id c18mr29256169pjr.179.1620003572264; Sun, 02 May 2021 17:59:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620003572; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jHlazbss1yIaJNKkkhWu/dEH3s0ofA3WdAscxwUWMDh0W1l1qvkHdg51hE5iGcTFcn /iSflN0dlU6UkhOH9V216dKfw7hsTCEoiPLPMrw8b3RKsIknocJ1btQ4rc4AvhigvehR ufi5PvKyWJqXjI7pYqOPfZVOIk0IiRXkpQEovyekpnZTqzYpXLQpMbz88DvOrWlMPRNS eLD6GaRCIaVEYBYj6pYbSWtYO9E1DeVXDqsESxNZtDyMUIm5MgYUzpW0la/NvDoflH88 SKfWOx4/RtqPAA9TnZFsKiQcTyVeJPOeEepzm9vymlIL4TMfw/6V0UjXzvt2ewuuO9re iiMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=IDhySqU+Lk+s5GHdK6vgLUXqyiNVJP1ZTC0GsDjbXIE=; b=Mjw+BvBPTfSJt3HtSQa7Lx9RtpDVEW4KEoR/vQpCvxv6rJaGdHctP0ZSLhoAzYH8pa 6Xb/JBtVIfHzzcngGkMbwJ0pGCXowyPf4p0YWRpdokxOcDUdvYRwODwCj316hE39GUxi waKD05IQOZRs7e61jw06lWHD7p68x5nZMPAbtVIac4qCn96mazM9sIwW0JP3kAVIarVx 4iR062OeDuRb9O0PvRoxxqvblfMAw7sniclbQtQXkp+fAwx1AWlbmrpLTIQEbwzDzhIR cupHXEZx1JMYuq+WbeEjfCoGwwd9ZP6HMZMSZMB25zee0SrS+dq4yZIRlordKEU/UlDA 1byw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q14si7515125pgt.267.2021.05.02.17.59.19; Sun, 02 May 2021 17:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232797AbhECA7c (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 2 May 2021 20:59:32 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:40589 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232766AbhECA7c (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 20:59:32 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 1430j0Yc013128; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:45:00 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 1430ivVE013125; Sun, 2 May 2021 19:44:57 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 19:44:57 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Joe Perches Cc: Miguel Ojeda , Masahiro Yamada , Albert Ou , Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-kernel , Linus Torvalds , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Catalin Marinas , Miguel Ojeda , Paul Mackerras , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Will Deacon , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Raise the minimum GCC version to 5.2 Message-ID: <20210503004457.GI10366@gate.crashing.org> References: <20210501151538.145449-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> <3943bc020f6227c8801907317fc113aa13ad4bad.camel@perches.com> <20210502183030.GF10366@gate.crashing.org> <81a926a3bdb70debe3ae2b13655ea8d249fb9991.camel@perches.com> <20210502203253.GH10366@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 02:23:01PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 15:32 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 01:00:28PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > [] > > > Perhaps 8 might be best as that has a __diag warning control mechanism. > > > > I have no idea what you mean? > > ? read the last bit of compiler-gcc.h Ah, you mean #pragma GCC diagnostic (which has existed since GCC 4.2). Does anything in this __diag stuff require GCC 8? Other than that this is hardcoded here :-) Segher