Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp2927889pxy; Mon, 3 May 2021 11:04:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEt3W4+Z8Tn/Lp+RCJepx152bY77Vsu3GzKkkQws2WENXX9MEWAlw9xdv/TLn2x21lcro5 X-Received: by 2002:a63:3689:: with SMTP id d131mr19706822pga.38.1620065093430; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:04:53 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620065093; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S0liZSMT9kqPG+gFpfpWVTy9cUrJTN35xd5edueIREp+3i1LDdtBfSt+bcXixI3XlZ sJ6fE3+pKgmHZOicAe5q2l1rpf+68/JfSRMTLrR1VUz/zeI+pa4j1YtvFHPI6F/4FbGn PWkig+49Tzi79DWZf5I2U2bVA5AQm4QkrB44Nr/avX+8JJlXJXlD8F+i/Su7Fv50oNxZ aITE6enTXAFRS8UpxdE+KLlhWK50mrWBnc8EdB7Q8B1464fGK4cwZN10SpQ4pj0+/PJL hJhk50fSb21Jk3PT+HdTamVTPq6KfOB7+du4TD0B2xfHBwVTiI+k9twc181AktL08fZC 5hVA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=JdqdcOGVpPA6d9udwHnpcEfu6wXzstPFZDvloGmnNfM=; b=Pc0qscQ4vQFwuRlVooFSKBatAoSE/3WAcHeaoS3SjarAcxPRGlDtcaR5AgDPKCtQDD uDlAM3ASu92hRQKORQYGfi2ANQmCFWwKbfBHzXewjEFqKdnPZxxHgyLzn3TtbSEk9zN3 qyPZAbk4RxNoUa6YD1lyynHtfkvTou3EQdJX9ZLuqTFG0pbfXOiCzMjHQ8E5OMQGXcxP 5831s5deECdEOUUB5GGkxSs9MoSaq6cgyQVcf/O5Hyib+8jSlZkFvE501LHglallIEK/ EOeHQxEHS601Y0yQ3Murux9IoXBLcUxif2UnXNtowXBTvOnhptPzTrf3YVhOJ1tlgJKD 16yA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lp2si15524284pjb.138.2021.05.03.11.04.40; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233809AbhECMxO (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 May 2021 08:53:14 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:40128 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230246AbhECMxL (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 08:53:11 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B4EED1; Mon, 3 May 2021 05:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.6] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90A173F70D; Mon, 3 May 2021 05:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/fair: Only compute base_energy_pd if necessary To: Pierre.Gondois@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xuewen.yan@unisoc.com, qperret@qperret.net Cc: Lukasz.Luba@arm.com, Vincent.Donnefort@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com References: <20210429101948.31224-1-Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> <20210429101948.31224-2-Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 14:52:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210429101948.31224-2-Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/04/2021 12:19, Pierre.Gondois@arm.com wrote: > From: Pierre Gondois > > find_energy_efficient_cpu() searches the best energy CPU > to place a task on. To do so, the energy of each performance domain > (pd) is computed w/ and w/o the task placed in each pd. s/in each pd/on it ? > > The energy of a pd w/o the task (base_energy_pd) is computed prior > knowing whether a CPU is available in the pd. > > Move the base_energy_pd computation after looping through the CPUs > of a pd and only computes it if at least one CPU is available. s/computes/compute [...] > + if (max_spare_cap_cpu < 0 && !compute_prev_delta) > + continue; > + > + /* Compute the 'base' energy of the pd, without @p */ > + base_energy_pd = compute_energy(p, -1, pd); > + base_energy += base_energy_pd; > + /* Evaluate the energy impact of using prev_cpu. */ You agreed on this one during v1 review ;-) > + if (compute_prev_delta) { > + prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, pd); > + prev_delta -= base_energy_pd; > + best_delta = min(best_delta, prev_delta); > + } > + > /* Evaluate the energy impact of using this CPU. */ better: /* Evaluate the energy impact of using max_spare_cap_cpu. */ 'this' has lost its context and people might read it as 'this_cpu' or smp_processor_id(). > - if (max_spare_cap_cpu >= 0 && max_spare_cap_cpu != prev_cpu) { > + if (max_spare_cap_cpu >= 0) { > cur_delta = compute_energy(p, max_spare_cap_cpu, pd); > cur_delta -= base_energy_pd; > if (cur_delta < best_delta) { > With these minor things sorted: Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann