Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751024AbWJTTw0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:52:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751104AbWJTTw0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:52:26 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:2715 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750934AbWJTTwZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:52:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20061020.125226.59656580.davem@davemloft.net> To: shemminger@osdl.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20061020122527.56292b56@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20061020081857.743b5eb7@localhost.localdomain> <20061020.122427.55507415.davem@davemloft.net> <20061020122527.56292b56@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 567 Lines: 14 From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700 > Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any > differently than out-of-tree other code. I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable. Don't you think? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/