Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp2930627pxy; Mon, 3 May 2021 11:08:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4qyGssBbRbCq7d6ijGeJw1XUKB92607HFEeYkvHxZ2UFLlX3uHR6Z2KU46MrAz0eNwb3R X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b8a:b029:ec:7fc8:7e89 with SMTP id p10-20020a1709026b8ab02900ec7fc87e89mr22249868plk.58.1620065288103; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:08:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620065288; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=06+ZJCdsp74AHWysR46Q7RyDUK7saqQj33FaUrju3Dr6IQRXd6voUAKKIQlRBXskRU IKW5PHNwS3fHXb1PtREUZv+xryeCFsrKWAgXZVDrCnNxOPJQQr0SgDam+oZmO8GABR1X oEb1zBWlRj4Qr44jEKnGHQFAtwr70Kmf6UBhgi7fbezULQSXe1ND2LdXLoWXAQcECRl4 IAfOaFfkoJq7saIwWZcxuVLK24zfN8wfW0QC1tzOMC8wd4znQcrwN06sm21MvI4c8a5z uBUfZiF1k1RUi82Dx90W/BdL10KiI6cy7FUNikz2QfoED1wVSq8QaFdwJvjVKl1OB/ze rywQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from :references:cc:to:dkim-signature; bh=IOqsilqvn+aRNNXngzMn1OYzuH7ToC3yrg+kEaYj+1g=; b=RpyrxaVefDSxleuA9i4SzjAH04EPCOn4QmX/MJ24LIX183EMKymlQXx1k6lptrBLne jz15A0xeaWKQqzIaHxZrJkpTx91tOWPYCjeVfKsUp1FqVpFyDCWiPXQ3LWo3Dg3lUgVu nGsoPw5Iakx/W8v2HhQaHIVifHU9roAOoUa6TyStSEdgNLxckhhUfW8r9cZyGrvf3tUK 3xESgJaPM0L774Iyb/BLWWUTwkmj3HFBfFKXLRc43VJr5xI7A9LLzGQHhDsdS5JuFD0A BDIxDZnKaFo8/ViGNQYjkqXvZtuH1WR5bbWi5qVLUbW6I+pX/CMU06hS82DU2UOZ0NAc zGDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=DfSyFZzk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w17si435325pll.253.2021.05.03.11.07.48; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=DfSyFZzk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234374AbhECNnX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 May 2021 09:43:23 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:29830 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234373AbhECNnV (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 09:43:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620049348; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IOqsilqvn+aRNNXngzMn1OYzuH7ToC3yrg+kEaYj+1g=; b=DfSyFZzkjK6crwUZDl72B4zuy/n9jpuppsOeFpwDJuLFZEwwunNfnOVRAipva6ld2iTuP7 CfLxHZh6IxCft/aaiR+3ymbcZsdo/sZPSUlHtj8XzvYGq4QZvz4UMQNG8WP9MIlQCzhOdn q72TcE4+S6g2t3x3aXlwvMNpN2++4iM= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-494--n9EI8DLNFyibqFap02nFA-1; Mon, 03 May 2021 09:42:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -n9EI8DLNFyibqFap02nFA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id d8-20020a0564020008b0290387d38e3ce0so4564999edu.1 for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 06:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:references:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IOqsilqvn+aRNNXngzMn1OYzuH7ToC3yrg+kEaYj+1g=; b=tidFwUtJdtj1998RpkSMzWWVclX/gjFu+ClbkurBGYFBVjds3vYX1vwroQzk41aS0b 0f0c45r5wtKxxNkk6WRyZFHSGWUqb5Ms1hX6f4KynQVA60q6lGE0bp8EVxK5Y1iIybD+ EJKKp5xCcTnup2xUkOmm/rOiS2jM2t3sRHil4gG5R+09OcDeQfMrcLQDrVt805HjuK5z 3/1pwjG17HqSfc4iEuW8zcXsKNIgOwTP9phz6y/lVObWdHh8yk2ayP7ExztiybNLnOVv 0bvDm0O/kLFlHaqWvhOZQOeVZfcC7y7JMXXnQoiV1lPL48EDRhV7oaF3amFJrkY7uCHj swVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329KOA3Xms3QlWJEs/hJFmhkZogsV8PBtXLplrU9coyNvGAa43L eh/IesiJDyUGQfxSd3G+5ZMVdwGqTjSAqk/bMKOFBRkPdC5Ia+M706pwPxOdeJaGHsPCiNxPoU9 pgDliuJlbdbGX5SlwebXvNj16 X-Received: by 2002:a50:82e2:: with SMTP id 89mr19872363edg.0.1620049343335; Mon, 03 May 2021 06:42:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a50:82e2:: with SMTP id 89mr19872346edg.0.1620049343181; Mon, 03 May 2021 06:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c25sm12614554edt.43.2021.05.03.06.42.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 May 2021 06:42:22 -0700 (PDT) To: Ben Gardon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , Peter Shier , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong References: <20210429211833.3361994-1-bgardon@google.com> <20210429211833.3361994-2-bgardon@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Track if shadow MMU active Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 15:42:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210429211833.3361994-2-bgardon@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/04/21 23:18, Ben Gardon wrote: > +void activate_shadow_mmu(struct kvm *kvm) > +{ > + kvm->arch.shadow_mmu_active = true; > +} > + I think there's no lock protecting both the write and the read side. Therefore this should be an smp_store_release, and all checks in patch 2 should be an smp_load_acquire. Also, the assignments to slot->arch.rmap in patch 4 (alloc_memslot_rmap) should be an rcu_assign_pointer, while __gfn_to_rmap must be changed like so: + struct kvm_rmap_head *head; ... - return &slot->arch.rmap[level - PG_LEVEL_4K][idx]; + head = srcu_dereference(slot->arch.rmap[level - PG_LEVEL_4K], &kvm->srcu, + lockdep_is_held(&kvm->slots_arch_lock)); + return &head[idx]; Paolo