Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Lazily allocate memslot rmaps
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
References: <20210429211833.3361994-1-bgardon@google.com>
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <a3279647-fb30-4033-2a9d-75d473bd8f8e@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 May 2021 15:44:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210429211833.3361994-1-bgardon@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 29/04/21 23:18, Ben Gardon wrote:
> This series enables KVM to save memory when using the TDP MMU by waiting
> to allocate memslot rmaps until they are needed. To do this, KVM tracks
> whether or not a shadow root has been allocated. In order to get away
> with not allocating the rmaps, KVM must also be sure to skip operations
> which iterate over the rmaps. If the TDP MMU is in use and we have not
> allocated a shadow root, these operations would essentially be op-ops
> anyway. Skipping the rmap operations has a secondary benefit of avoiding
> acquiring the MMU lock in write mode in many cases, substantially
> reducing MMU lock contention.
> 
> This series was tested on an Intel Skylake machine. With the TDP MMU off
> and on, this introduced no new failures on kvm-unit-tests or KVM selftests.

Thanks, I only reported some technicalities in the ordering of loads 
(which matter since the loads happen with SRCU protection only).  Apart 
from this, this looks fine!

Paolo

> Changelog:
> v2:
> 	Incorporated feedback from Paolo and Sean
> 	Replaced the memslot_assignment_lock with slots_arch_lock, which
> 	has a larger critical section.
> 
> Ben Gardon (7):
>    KVM: x86/mmu: Track if shadow MMU active
>    KVM: x86/mmu: Skip rmap operations if shadow MMU inactive
>    KVM: x86/mmu: Deduplicate rmap freeing
>    KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out allocating memslot rmap
>    KVM: mmu: Refactor memslot copy
>    KVM: mmu: Add slots_arch_lock for memslot arch fields
>    KVM: x86/mmu: Lazily allocate memslot rmaps
> 
>   arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  13 +++
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu_internal.h |   2 +
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c      |   6 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.h      |   4 +-
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 110 +++++++++++++++++++----
>   include/linux/kvm_host.h        |   9 ++
>   virt/kvm/kvm_main.c             |  54 ++++++++---
>   8 files changed, 264 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>