Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:25:32 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
Message-ID: <20061020132532.65a3e655@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061020.125226.59656580.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20061020081857.743b5eb7@localhost.localdomain>
	<20061020.122427.55507415.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20061020122527.56292b56@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
	<20061020.125226.59656580.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 757
Lines: 21

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700
> 
> > Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any
> > differently than out-of-tree other code.
> 
> I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to
> requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable.
> Don't you think?


Netdump doesn't even exist in the current Fedora source rpm.
I think Dave dropped it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/