Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp2933211pxy; Mon, 3 May 2021 11:10:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhlnhq74C9p4P4a8kpRpZ5WaHs8wkkMX0W1XEDN52msV9Yqrg/AzfFvgU2nLwrDKOD7eyn X-Received: by 2002:aa7:90d4:0:b029:28e:b912:acf with SMTP id k20-20020aa790d40000b029028eb9120acfmr3135186pfk.43.1620065449547; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:10:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620065449; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z8dgEmLh5T0MRF1bbkiXf+5XIvcuJ9X4F0LjIiWiMxfpIOjvmfrdF1FwIm90/L7tVH ahZKB0mZozR2Z7ou2Ihr6gIil9wcL43dQAyNwSIRWxaXYowyXNhvMvl5joPQLDe5+aLa Ht2vJ9uzRvRHfcI0tbUWAHKDKLQ5pcWN1azr3woVlrRD0NkgqNsIvktqMmnjjmYZYcZt OHo3ACCap93A+T1jCHjA4xg/GWkuMThqjMNP4AiHXJD35F3X9yPGGgAwTiThVDL/2u3+ 4zEjs4dtUD/TNzn1ErSGQVGiA/UTfHbziXXY3e0nMiKpUJYgzOfdJniuBlqjHCabB8OG 3/Iw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=mLWn2Bm+ged3fuObrNXQRHmGzUAtT7+v1ZR4Rf0VlH0=; b=SHgOOHQYScs7FtKgLHITXzvSR8zf/WI9gcTfKoPZl6Xzo3ePeI6OvN+GrQArUlrn7G nsscMbTKtu1kAR0629CFAyY865zMXNBDbxaGNjkkhjBF1Bi0d9JvYv1ku9f3dkfLWoXj hG9+mLb23Xb9pxECVFWudXRhJWK4MB+UoJG9BXXYPcU66F5EyvUwrlcBz4iWITINMXnZ Qy8KKLtePnCC/Gpn2hC5cACZDI5iBGKKBXM44LJ/luLCxgzGYDVY0UKuV8nH9WtoM0+Q ttVv4riZ0kcZ2FNyyI6fCVswYRByk66Yp+U7vfokuQcn72GBnKQUfHIWZ7GAjWTEId3c SRTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ei5iKt1j; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m3si13555636pfk.182.2021.05.03.11.10.36; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Ei5iKt1j; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230410AbhECPoc (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 May 2021 11:44:32 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:27602 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230346AbhECPoa (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 May 2021 11:44:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620056617; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mLWn2Bm+ged3fuObrNXQRHmGzUAtT7+v1ZR4Rf0VlH0=; b=Ei5iKt1jOLp0ASngAHaXU3WMEIaKwBzCqHSExJXRUU2zc0IWSnusdJJXrkCaSsg5SvYtFh Vl/Wu8HF8kI0ZSUx+d0CjNgNQSi+gJ13war1LSrYjoNJ1AvpQA4zauBBabVE3wcLMhUmaN fYLgVi/SJOnl7/xkhJB9HEICp5PpmuE= Received: from mail-ej1-f69.google.com (mail-ej1-f69.google.com [209.85.218.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-180-usaZspqMNNOFzhy-jb3-qQ-1; Mon, 03 May 2021 11:43:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: usaZspqMNNOFzhy-jb3-qQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ne22-20020a1709077b96b02903803a047edeso2219949ejc.3 for ; Mon, 03 May 2021 08:43:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mLWn2Bm+ged3fuObrNXQRHmGzUAtT7+v1ZR4Rf0VlH0=; b=WIFNvjhVA/u6AXxtE0ng1kdS2WanBtaORJ2RxEF/qmE6xjxuqm65+VtL3CCfD1fCzy o6HejHb6Lgm96VLNUT6Frz6Sdls8Yx6u6FD1etiibmYCdSzkkyk/ell7w3nnECsXNvR+ 53OXmXIcbHYyRfDyDmuLtqYyqpD8AyRyzYHPrHYZF98zoG+kDrWMtbIZDVbFezcR5Xuw 8Jrb5qiWNPWGKWGmZEY4TZOH7RZSsH3GA8zjs3hdXv+aaWBZC1rJ7Sif7f2Fx2Lni/vA XYuwPAFZTYqH829BtEzlHcV4N2oNfaBPOBA/SdlJB3A3A/6oTQocedLafVxZVRUqplUm f5Ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sRJqREo5BNjDY2whf7Pk8dFdzzHHmn1exvrU6d9ZAMF3BbUIk 0TSiu3zfjBJbVnqZlriJX8Y15t9ys+E4iRMDx2iUI3rR2MI84+wJ/FW/cBwJVezj4J2lYKjg2yw bimTgpAazfqNAFlbfyaekjWxY9dTz29uREh+sJ1L28MRt+/CitmSb0nSu1Vs4lbTioat9WABsbg vD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5495:: with SMTP id r21mr17457094ejo.471.1620056614115; Mon, 03 May 2021 08:43:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5495:: with SMTP id r21mr17457065ejo.471.1620056613892; Mon, 03 May 2021 08:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm30061ejz.95.2021.05.03.08.43.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 May 2021 08:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Fix migration of nested guests when eVMCS is in use To: Vitaly Kuznetsov , kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Sean Christopherson , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Maxim Levitsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210503150854.1144255-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:43:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210503150854.1144255-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/05/21 17:08, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Win10 guests with WSL2 enabled sometimes crash on migration when > enlightened VMCS was used. The condition seems to be induced by the > situation when L2->L1 exit is caused immediately after migration and > before L2 gets a chance to run (e.g. when there's an interrupt pending). Interesting, I think it gets to nested_vmx_vmexit before if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu)) { if (unlikely(!kvm_x86_ops.nested_ops->get_nested_state_pages(vcpu))) { r = 0; goto out; } } due to the infamous calls to check_nested_events that are scattered through KVM? Paolo