Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161087AbWJUATm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:19:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030355AbWJUATm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:19:42 -0400 Received: from emailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.24]:6881 "EHLO emailer.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030205AbWJUATl (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:19:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 02:17:51 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: "Horst H. von Brand" cc: Jens Axboe , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: fs/Kconfig question regarding CONFIG_BLOCK In-Reply-To: <200610210014.k9L0E3pr005019@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Message-ID: References: <200610210014.k9L0E3pr005019@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 433 Lines: 16 >> I'd be surprised if if BLOCK wasn't faster over, say, 10 depends on >> BLOCK. > >I'd be /very/ surprised if anybody even noticed... I am about to do a poorman's benchmark. -`J' -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/