Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pseries/drmem: update LMBs after LPM
To:     Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
        mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Cc:     nathanl@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210428094758.28665-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
 <87fsz95qso.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
 <9d29bf8c-9e97-c179-6897-8e25fa4eb516@linux.ibm.com>
 <271ef351-b89c-ba68-3b6d-baa24cc0021b@linux.ibm.com>
 <c87e17d3-8956-9eb0-6f8a-ae316ea75f7e@linux.ibm.com>
 <1eac9540-e8b4-53be-1f27-4c36f92c8a5e@linux.ibm.com>
 <bdc510ff-f9f6-b032-0f0d-52a274fb9dab@linux.ibm.com>
From:   Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <f8b12753-5f4c-c64f-0847-3d52dc464ce2@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 May 2021 09:03:56 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bdc510ff-f9f6-b032-0f0d-52a274fb9dab@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Le 03/05/2021 à 22:44, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit :
> On 5/3/21 10:28 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> Le 01/05/2021 à 01:58, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit :
>>> On 4/30/21 9:13 AM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>>>> Le 29/04/2021 à 21:12, Tyrel Datwyler a écrit :
>>>>> On 4/29/21 3:27 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>>>> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>>>>>>
> 
> Snip
> 
>>>
>>> As of today I don't have a problem with your patch. This was more of me pointing
>>> out things that I think are currently wrong with our memory hotplug
>>> implementation, and that we need to take a long hard look at it down the road.
>>
>> I do agree, there is a lot of odd things there to address in this area.
>> If you're ok with that patch, do you mind to add a reviewed-by?
>>
> 
> Can you send a v4 with the fix for the duplicate update included?

Of course !
I wrote it last week, but let in the to-be-sent list, my mistake.