Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of garmin.com designates
 204.77.163.244 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=204.77.163.244; helo=edgetransport.garmin.com;
From:   "Huang, Joseph" <Joseph.Huang@garmin.com>
To:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
        <bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/6] bridge: Fix snooping in multi-bridge config with
 switchdev
Thread-Topic: [PATCH net 0/6] bridge: Fix snooping in multi-bridge config with
 switchdev
Thread-Index: AQHXQRKRJez3iJGzm0eCT/EpouXvN6rUE08A//+0kwQ=
Date:   Tue, 4 May 2021 20:37:45 +0000
Message-ID: <685c25c2423c451480c0ad2cf78877be@garmin.com>
References: <20210504182259.5042-1-Joseph.Huang@garmin.com>,<6fd5711c-8d53-d72b-995d-1caf77047ecf@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fd5711c-8d53-d72b-995d-1caf77047ecf@nvidia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2021 20:37:46.4328
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d28cc703-faed-4f91-3cb3-08d90f3c79cc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 38d0d425-ba52-4c0a-a03e-2a65c8e82e2d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=38d0d425-ba52-4c0a-a03e-2a65c8e82e2d;Ip=[204.77.163.244];Helo=[edgetransport.garmin.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6NAM10FT062.eop-nam10.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR04MB7224
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: --Q2QQ_LzBjJQxmvOzT8IjsFlLTp9zCO
X-Proofpoint-GUID: --Q2QQ_LzBjJQxmvOzT8IjsFlLTp9zCO
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391,18.0.761
 definitions=2021-05-04_15:2021-05-04,2021-05-04 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501
 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0
 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0
 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1
 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105040138
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Hi,
> This patch-set is inappropriate for -net, if at all. It's quite late over=
 here and I'll
> review the rest later, but I can say from a quick peek that patch 02 is
> unacceptable for it increases the complexity with 1 order of magnitude of=
 all
> add/del call paths and some of them can be invoked on user packets. A lot=
 of
> this functionality should be "hidden" in the driver or done by a user-spa=
ce
> daemon/helper.
> Most of the flooding behaviour changes must be hidden behind some new
> option otherwise they'll break user setups that rely on the current. I'll=
 review
> the patches in detail over the following few days, net-next is closed any=
way.
>=20
> Cheers,
>  Nik

Hi Nik,

Thanks for your quick response!
Once you have a chance to review the set, please let me know how I can impr=
ove them to make them acceptable. These are real problems and we do need to=
 fix them.

Thanks,
Joseph