Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp4029219pxy; Tue, 4 May 2021 16:07:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwISvEqPFKaQHb1rXMI3wQiuzPdZFQV/0EHiBQikIXJoZwOqMLKBgxS7eFG2pKzCmoUzf8j X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b20:: with SMTP id mp32mr24671853ejc.495.1620169631943; Tue, 04 May 2021 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620169631; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TmPtlQjDFEj0IVnbSl/iFh5P5XZsQkKRw0p/7YpUnztDdJqySTVa69QonXx+5UwxsU BjKlqu9aHeu6WFkFOelT/NLldrPQDElVIU9vt98JVq0+qHvAzjGytYoyW3mJe+3K5PWC yjLjEK8ZJqCLmK8hGz0tEaAI99jyadf5Ntx1YIp7pQFpiRPJZzIsAgUrixRoB7N0j1Ml VHeTgkw//VZ6D7N2xWNBj5D15tUfV+GvD8q9fESkgVwinig4dhb4N0yOlsohRDPzl3QH BftYEeSO5QELsBNtJT/NcrVquCdddcUy5sbJu53s0Cjnyp9BYHXaRJaz3Ik0KZ25aBMd Vlfw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=u5wx41z50pCB3+EhCZHMkwVSScXyhuneIJqUcIw0yxo=; b=qRMP2QDyGBR80u8bT/8eiQMcFWp4gT+Yit4pZfN2gdUg56R8jUwWOqXzw8DMn6Ai+i uZeIday6YkdkZIPXN9glPgyLHgNC1Ir3vU1MJ2MGxpVsNYEvx0olzYTkba1ulNFztJQv otiDMKULKZ0IIsE/kDEp5YeTDXZI7QoeU9bGfmY/iQ7MDYt9yvvE80rLNLxDMbEju+3c XFMMvL6OEITp+VPi+FBFl/RDv2aDiN2dHNO41H7moJOPhbJVja40W6LHRcx7AGNIRVSX OdQTfuN5Fco0gwhopDxjRXKYt9L65JHnAUTpjMXhakDvda7nWN2uz7UjZ3XEM8f6vvuI r+vw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=X50cSRFP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s18si4276024ejh.110.2021.05.04.16.06.48; Tue, 04 May 2021 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=X50cSRFP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232869AbhEDUhN (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232841AbhEDUhM (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2021 16:37:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0B0C06138A for ; Tue, 4 May 2021 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id m190so35470pga.2 for ; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=u5wx41z50pCB3+EhCZHMkwVSScXyhuneIJqUcIw0yxo=; b=X50cSRFP/zhaGlqtpXk5ERLSQ3V/fLVmzPvQ0svEtG42GKZ5bZU0Otm9tX8X16D/6R tH7kkO25tK5gE32+2NETMJz713wkX1slowKJj5HLN5ZLm1O9SMAKKW4eGoHHjH+/Yx6n GPwLScjAKKkrsQhVeJWB2s84UkF4Ahqk+/v9PPWRm+X8PsRn1jedNhyfkuvGpeP/uPQU flxq3h+cjEgq3FuMZuBgqOIXb9UtcANXI3RaJ0XgCMBG9EqYpLyCpQ4H8+2IL0iTdlS6 gZouv77UQEyjiRAefIG+qoJBOUhs/ULQIcQaDR0qDKfu2rDtAFnQA8OmKZcusmOD8Swh sYRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=u5wx41z50pCB3+EhCZHMkwVSScXyhuneIJqUcIw0yxo=; b=d+UAP6GRoM7vHVupSyI1KcP4V357XlWJun0idlN87JSjLC4DzEAED5Hgq31B0SgEb9 JLR3+K04YOy3uZegJPC6od93cG/XAzf+Bl0SBtmQlp4i9pSGMYOxhtzppQ6eJDm0rQOH Wh1sx5qCiyttwCraS91KomErxtzrgJ/JQdeATThfIKwtYrtuVO5GiOkvhH1AZSvlXRhz tFUUR0ae/H4faleimNSQK51Yro1lSE8QwWij2CqYN94Q9Z7W9+aLqEAF95eFIwmvQsnc yonI4QG1htN09gW6Vt/8PsutOLxd053cljaCL/QsMkPg5V71AddRzk7TCKAhMF4tjRo3 YqRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DMHmYMHAadDVieXSCyBt1kFrLMyzqhXti9tI4WJUzyGQ/O6bf DjtwC/M29yjlAtURMa8xzouriQaIx+42Gg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:5757:: with SMTP id h23mr7111744pgm.279.1620160574215; Tue, 04 May 2021 13:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (240.111.247.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.247.111.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v123sm12979793pfb.80.2021.05.04.13.36.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 May 2021 13:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 20:36:09 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Ben Gardon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu , Peter Shier , Junaid Shahid , Jim Mattson , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Xiao Guangrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: x86/mmu: Track if shadow MMU active Message-ID: References: <20210429211833.3361994-1-bgardon@google.com> <20210429211833.3361994-2-bgardon@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 04, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 04/05/21 21:55, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > But, I think we we can avoid bikeshedding by simply eliminating this flag. More > > in later patches. > > Are you thinking of checking slot->arch.rmap[0] directly? That should work > indeed. > > > > - kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(kvm); > > > + if (!kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(kvm)) > > > + activate_shadow_mmu(kvm); > > Doesn't come into play yet, but I would strongly prefer to open code setting the > > necessary flag instead of relying on the helper to never fail. > > > > You mean > > kvm->arch.shadow_mmu_active = !kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(kvm); > > (which would assign to alloc_memslot_rmaps instead if shadow_mmu_active is > removed)? That makes sense. Ya, that or: if (kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(kvm)) kvm->arch.memslots_have_rmaps = true; I don't have a preference between the two variants.