Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2993036AbWJUNmL (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:42:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2993041AbWJUNmL (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:42:11 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:37801 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993036AbWJUNmK (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:42:10 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add include/linux/freezer.h and move definitions from sched.h Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:41:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: LKML , Linux PM , suspend2-devel References: <1161433266.7644.7.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> In-Reply-To: <1161433266.7644.7.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610211541.19050.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 642 Lines: 18 On Saturday, 21 October 2006 14:21, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Move process freezing functions from include/linux/sched.h to freezer.h, Hm, I'd rather move them to suspend.h. Is there any reason for introducing yet another header file? > so that modifications to the freezer or the kernel configuration don't > require recompiling just about everything. Yes, that's annoying. Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/