Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 5 May 2021 15:45:47 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
        Aili Yao <yaoaili@kingsoft.com>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
        linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] mm: rename and move page_is_poisoned()
Message-ID: <YJKhi6T33UmiZ/kE@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <20210429122519.15183-1-david@redhat.com>
 <20210429122519.15183-4-david@redhat.com>
 <YJKZ5yXdl18m9YSM@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <0710d8d5-2608-aeed-10c7-50a272604d97@redhat.com>
 <YJKdS+Q8CgSlgmFf@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <57ac524c-b49a-99ec-c1e4-ef5027bfb61b@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57ac524c-b49a-99ec-c1e4-ef5027bfb61b@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed 05-05-21 15:39:08, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > Long story short, this should be good enough for the cases we actually can
> > > handle? What am I missing?
> > 
> > I am not sure I follow. My point is that I fail to see any added value
> > of the check as it doesn't prevent the race (it fundamentally cannot as
> > the page can be poisoned at any time) but the failure path doesn't
> > put_page which is incorrect even for hwpoison pages.
> 
> Oh, I think you are right. If we have a page and return NULL we would leak a
> reference.
> 
> Actually, we discussed in that thread handling this entirely differently,
> which resulted in a v7 [1]; however Andrew moved forward with this
> (outdated?) patch, maybe that was just a mistake?
> 
> Yes, I agree we should revert that patch for now.

OK, Let me send the revert to Andrew.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs