Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:41:20 +0200
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [discuss] Please pull x86 tree
Message-ID: <20061021194120.GG5211@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
References: <200610211844.07051.ak@suse.de> <20061021175121.GF5211@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <200610212014.48914.ak@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200610212014.48914.ak@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1255
Lines: 32

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 08:14:48PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Saturday 21 October 2006 19:51, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:44:06PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > 
> > > Linus, please pull from
> > > 
> > >   git://one.firstfloor.org/home/andi/git/linux-2.6 for-linus
> > > 
> > > These are all accumulated bug fixes for x86-64 and i386 and should
> > > be all pretty safe.
> > > 
> > > The only thing that isn't a clear bug fix is the dwarf2 unwinder
> > > speedup -- i'm including that on popular demand because it fixes
> > > a serious performance regression with lockdep.
> > 
> > It would've been good to get the Calgary bug-fix in this
> > series... next one, please?
> 
> You said it wasn't critical and I only sent critical issues

You asked if it should go into 2.6.19 and I said it should. I also
said it's not critical, by which I meant "it doesn't need to go in
*right now*, it can wait for the next regularly-scheduled
patchset". Sorry about the confusion.

Thanks,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/