Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a852:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d18csp829367pxy; Wed, 5 May 2021 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrJr6E2XH7YwCt2r4Es3BTYJZQ2Pv9/bsFXqlKaxvL8BzAGTkJpoFbfUFVKtypIY7z9/D2 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:16c2:b029:228:964e:8b36 with SMTP id l2-20020a056a0016c2b0290228964e8b36mr973453pfc.11.1620252741375; Wed, 05 May 2021 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620252741; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SezKoKH+tBSPWAZdS35R8XiztBDyNJsxmwnixVmGg6P8QuXLSmX5UE9hLlglRLJ1Q7 ncG9wjSYqkGVuCPD49BMc8D48u1whpRcjVjJ9de7iDdWb7KXh/tVt7PGUL4kGegfdgLk chKG/AhheGCpi41sfCNhenNhCUqZhGGs4m8xJKT7CxS2d5CYUHsZmuwmeUc/0CifZA8P I1GQ8mvrDYzQ2z44jcWR6VAmBO4e2e0tAZ/OIVwh6XKy/7jTgYnUAAKDLlp6BbLp///n YW+yCDvK/iRJ4WXYokdMK0guj0njrDEA5stlAPRWRc1NSRN/cjaobd5LsKdEENMz9Aqq E94g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=kg+jh8wR2UKTqhrmzGpjAxwA7Y08KcCVgqRmB9csd8c=; b=jbpR9cB/7TjKS7iwugA0oVuwuMq3l9OtavrTlohu38S9wnsFeP+bJ3OHU6Gjt/z8sl GArWqCN0ZnceVpndLIcyQwRV+vj6e+NPvvxlx19yQLlV1Iv4WgzHPNjcak9hBKIRRsqU y4PuL4EHqMpNQEnoyTXySWwaZ3GU8fuK8XokN5GNO2qWA78AaRu+t2O+wdYql7+6NOED 5YK/Fy5i1x+tVB+jSGimXwchzehTV8iFaTelN2piaWJpSYUtJEHBr8U3zhcMZuoWGGu5 VNYN2C0KT/vJBp4CrnxFKvTRPTVthZTPtJiXjO1DQM1gSAwXKFQReAv5R0JQhRzZyjvS VLHQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d6si525593pgk.10.2021.05.05.15.12.08; Wed, 05 May 2021 15:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229862AbhEEUqV (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 5 May 2021 16:46:21 -0400 Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz ([46.255.230.98]:55402 "EHLO jabberwock.ucw.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229575AbhEEUqV (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 May 2021 16:46:21 -0400 Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 0E9A41C0B87; Wed, 5 May 2021 22:45:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 22:45:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Jianxiong Gao , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Yet another way to mark upstream commits was Re: [PATCH 5.10 13/29] swiotlb: add a IO_TLB_SIZE define Message-ID: <20210505204522.GA3061@amd> References: <20210505112326.195493232@linuxfoundation.org> <20210505112326.635285720@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210505112326.635285720@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > From: Jianxiong Gao >=20 > commit: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff This is 5th variant of marking upstream commits, and I need to update my scripts again. Could we please put this into Signed-off area, where it belongs, so it is easy to see who touched the patch for mainline, and stop this creativity? > Add a new IO_TLB_SIZE define instead open coding it using > IO_TLB_SHIFT all over. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > Acked-by: Jianxiong Gao > Tested-by: Jianxiong Gao > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk I'd like to see Upstream: b5d7ccb7aac3895c2138fe0980a109116ce15eff here. Probably. Note that it has additional advantage that you can easily marked who Acked/Tested the patch for mainline, and who tested it in the stable context. > Signed-off-by: Jianxiong Gao > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Best regards, Pavel --=20 http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmCTA+IACgkQMOfwapXb+vIyegCaAyDNebEFnDhFRikmTxeuWxIL tuUAoMBzNUEIigELl1VV1YrogOBZ395t =QNb3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--