Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   "Dongseok Yi" <dseok.yi@samsung.com>
To:     "'Willem de Bruijn'" <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc:     "'Daniel Borkmann'" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "'bpf'" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'Alexei Starovoitov'" <ast@kernel.org>,
        "'Andrii Nakryiko'" <andrii@kernel.org>,
        "'Martin KaFai Lau'" <kafai@fb.com>,
        "'Song Liu'" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
        "'Yonghong Song'" <yhs@fb.com>,
        "'John Fastabend'" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
        "'KP Singh'" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        "'David S. Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "'Jakub Kicinski'" <kuba@kernel.org>,
        "'Network Development'" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTScC96R5o24c-sbY-CEV4EYOVFepFR85O4uGtCLwOjnzEw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf] bpf: check for data_len before upgrading mss when 6
 to 4
Date:   Thu, 6 May 2021 11:27:43 +0900
Message-ID: <02c801d7421f$65287a90$2f796fb0$@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: ko
Thread-Index: AQKypHYW3xad5/j2XvChPebQmKG2owG+YoocAqFpyMsBZavlXQIxNaIYqN8+O7A=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 102P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <CGME20210429102143epcas2p4c8747c09a9de28f003c20389c050394a@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
        <1619690903-1138-1-git-send-email-dseok.yi@samsung.com>
        <8c2ea41a-3fc5-d560-16e5-bf706949d857@iogearbox.net>
        <02bf01d74211$0ff4aed0$2fde0c70$@samsung.com>
        <CA+FuTScC96R5o24c-sbY-CEV4EYOVFepFR85O4uGtCLwOjnzEw@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 09:45:37PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:45 PM Dongseok Yi <dseok.yi@samsung.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 10:55:10PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > On 4/29/21 12:08 PM, Dongseok Yi wrote:
> > > > tcp_gso_segment check for the size of GROed payload if it is bigger
> > > > than the mss. bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4 increases mss, but the mss can be
> > > > bigger than the size of GROed payload unexpectedly if data_len is not
> > > > big enough.
> > > >
> > > > Assume that skb gso_size = 1372 and data_len = 8. bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4
> 
> Is this a typo and is this intended to read skb->data_len = 1380?

This is not a typo. I intended skb->data_len = 8.

> 
> The issue is that payload length (1380) is greater than mss with ipv6
> (1372), but less than mss with ipv4 (1392).
> 
> I don't understand data_len = 8 or why the patch compares
> skb->data_len to len_diff (20).

skb_gro_receive():
        unsigned int len = skb_gro_len(skb);
        [...]
done:
        NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->count++;
        p->data_len += len;

head_skb's data_len is the sum of skb_gro_len for each skb of the frags.
data_len could be 8 if server sent a small size packet and it is GROed
to head_skb.

Please let me know if I am missing something.

> 
> One simple solution if this packet no longer needs to be segmented
> might be to reset the gso_type completely.

I am not sure gso_type can be cleared even when GSO is needed.

> 
> In general, I would advocate using BPF_F_ADJ_ROOM_FIXED_GSO. When
> converting from IPv6 to IPv4, fixed gso will end up building packets
> that are slightly below the MTU. That opportunity cost is negligible
> (especially with TSO). Unfortunately, I see that that flag is
> available for bpf_skb_adjust_room but not for bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4.
> 
> 
> > > > would increse the gso_size to 1392. tcp_gso_segment will get an error
> > > > with 1380 <= 1392.
> > > >
> > > > Check for the size of GROed payload if it is really bigger than target
> > > > mss when increase mss.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 6578171a7ff0 (bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper)
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dongseok Yi <dseok.yi@samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >   net/core/filter.c | 4 +++-
> > > >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> > > > index 9323d34..3f79e3c 100644
> > > > --- a/net/core/filter.c
> > > > +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> > > > @@ -3308,7 +3308,9 @@ static int bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > >             }
> > > >
> > > >             /* Due to IPv4 header, MSS can be upgraded. */
> > > > -           skb_increase_gso_size(shinfo, len_diff);
> > > > +           if (skb->data_len > len_diff)
> > >
> > > Could you elaborate some more on what this has to do with data_len specifically
> > > here? I'm not sure I follow exactly your above commit description. Are you saying
> > > that you're hitting in tcp_gso_segment():
> > >
> > >          [...]
> > >          mss = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
> > >          if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
> > >                  goto out;
> > >          [...]
> >
> > Yes, right
> >
> > >
> > > Please provide more context on the bug, thanks!
> >
> > tcp_gso_segment():
> >         [...]
> >         __skb_pull(skb, thlen);
> >
> >         mss = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size;
> >         if (unlikely(skb->len <= mss))
> >         [...]
> >
> > skb->len will have total GROed TCP payload size after __skb_pull.
> > skb->len <= mss will not be happened in a normal GROed situation. But
> > bpf_skb_proto_6_to_4 would upgrade MSS by increasing gso_size, it can
> > hit an error condition.
> >
> > We should ensure the following condition.
> > total GROed TCP payload > the original mss + (IPv6 size - IPv4 size)
> >
> > Due to
> > total GROed TCP payload = the original mss + skb->data_len
> > IPv6 size - IPv4 size = len_diff
> >
> > Finally, we can get the condition.
> > skb->data_len > len_diff
> >
> > >
> > > > +                   skb_increase_gso_size(shinfo, len_diff);
> > > > +
> > > >             /* Header must be checked, and gso_segs recomputed. */
> > > >             shinfo->gso_type |= SKB_GSO_DODGY;
> > > >             shinfo->gso_segs = 0;
> > > >
> >
> >