Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210426095426.118356-1-tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
 <20210426095426.118356-2-tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> <CACRpkda7n3VL-EpwdXDxt47azFo8Wkp67-urUy7--3D6TJs7iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAL_Jsq+48xVScx87WYD85Ty5CxqO3L8taMeQ7S9QwHew1+TjKA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+48xVScx87WYD85Ty5CxqO3L8taMeQ7S9QwHew1+TjKA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 May 2021 13:11:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaftBRUw_m9GjrqMreAF98iNTF4807LwkY9Mt7Ceh6k=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: gpio: Add devicetree binding for IDT
 79RC32434 GPIO controller
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:44 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 7:13 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:

> > Why can't interrupt support be made optional?
(...)
>
> If the hardware has interrupts, then we should describe that. It's the
> OS driver that may or may not support interrupts.

You're right of course. What was I thinking.

Yours,
Linus Walleij