Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp91296pxj; Fri, 7 May 2021 04:32:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJye/ocJW7xuMXqZlV6h+nIGFi7jFoYjM5xxKdZcWOys/70Dun7vD+uO4pnOL4vCMG7H3T+L X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:204c:: with SMTP id bc12mr10721057edb.35.1620387144240; Fri, 07 May 2021 04:32:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620387144; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MaounW/kL9HTWF2rDigJLDAVlhx21M3LLozGs/3zXCpEyZlYHdDV2FdP8mRzyiZArr GHsQDu/wO4yqNyJgR2jCKS8qjFHEsib3tjXLzBJZjiwnKHSIbcNtPPuD0siQAjOShWh2 Vrxqkv+ypqkVp4+I89MGCZmWb89t1fSddb1zsztmVmaUxmlzN6HcH+SwSR6tzThaoUQk zR8MWDSl1hIiCi5ZLWnzmnTtOe7KNApBPCVZmIDyWlbrRPXI9Y6qVFV6hV4kQRL3riZT rLJOMy2o/WfcHwpJOy05inApYkeJQFVQ0GxP1b/fE0V9Lnzz10mEvHZwEdtdkZ2TIJA4 3WuQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=2EtsHTWG0I945KmFB2rvkJ4C7JnZYKjnyrdpp2fnzKI=; b=zGO0NenjdRBpvxEkRAzFCdpw9bH6fbtC4oW0bU4wFNe19m8h31rNFADoVd2YhjSdm2 6F2wSZrkv+vKFkyDomTpRq7CI5gupgaFS2SxZbD2Rg/V+TB+2Zn6r96diIuofZQLMDdd 5uzb84JzrUyyZ+k2ae4fwZflhJ2CKHsVlm3oEZueTRnOZDPVjRn4NnSzkVciO/zGL/pL qMeKzhLlsby9wHQiRsIUssJRXulegunnZA9zdziynmdfUj7EQFTLC4xYR34rW1drU/Jo hgsV5By1ebQwa1LcEjzSGxKpmya+RVDRXoahi5xm8e4ZnDnlQHEg7DpL7zN21q8D33nP x3Dw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fvTIL1Z3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a15si5310497edr.562.2021.05.07.04.31.57; Fri, 07 May 2021 04:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fvTIL1Z3; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236216AbhEGI3h (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 May 2021 04:29:37 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:39926 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236218AbhEGI3d (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 04:29:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620376114; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2EtsHTWG0I945KmFB2rvkJ4C7JnZYKjnyrdpp2fnzKI=; b=fvTIL1Z3QDkm2RhwLHYUksiXz/9ci24ADiDSY9sX4z87RdfMddbzwAzQAG7AjWhI0eSTZE 6D1hz2bQRbtQAE7UfkoAmHsHzxbHj5qATa7et3SOypHuihFGJK8QQE6AwSKkike+dsWqib 4e03uSTy8N+TGXv8pNzdrKK4WIMMs+g= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-276-9xAI6RUPMGqG1tubrlK0sg-1; Fri, 07 May 2021 04:28:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9xAI6RUPMGqG1tubrlK0sg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id l2-20020adf9f020000b029010d6bb7f1cbso3265570wrf.7 for ; Fri, 07 May 2021 01:28:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2EtsHTWG0I945KmFB2rvkJ4C7JnZYKjnyrdpp2fnzKI=; b=fiNrwN623ASj9JEK6n4vqPczHSNsdPQJ1pcKVxveddCVWUT5pE7xqcQuolQqyT6AXA k9dIlxnFdpvabPnELS9B3g0Qx0xATnQRYbBldFiTmO0hW3yzfCdW87xdiKRPuKFjFbvj vaTavQi3+Nfxfa08B+G9bSlR3vNM2RDgcPNI0DpqH8kx+aghGPGiM4qPIB/YlBLqUA3s 1BB2EvIFKAGqDpU1HfoxQia2i0Ufk0Z0699uvLcqmcweBvnaD2qr/IWs1gBY9JUlagUP FSOr7IW+skYygTkdBfA0/phfamxzTKiT602xD/j53PiOqWYO3wbhg+pDBKE1DEz9npYs X/Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S2Gf0Nxf0+1/z7X7331gm86ojPNRUYQvnqIAALjlvo3vmxeNu 4q2+T7KcLaTRWfiUsUSZI5GmM74F7eZFavROiIxVLxP0pu38mqLncd+rl7G7f24Y1LvdXeIMAiw UaLWF8IBoUvVOmyY8IylAEIh0 X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4e06:: with SMTP id g6mr8566103wmh.30.1620376111671; Fri, 07 May 2021 01:28:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4e06:: with SMTP id g6mr8566077wmh.30.1620376111514; Fri, 07 May 2021 01:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:5e2c:eb9a:a8b6:fd3e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l21sm12474008wme.10.2021.05.07.01.28.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 May 2021 01:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a field to control memslot rmap allocation To: Ben Gardon , LKML , kvm Cc: Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , Peter Shier , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Xiao Guangrong , Kai Huang , Keqian Zhu References: <20210506184241.618958-1-bgardon@google.com> <20210506184241.618958-6-bgardon@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 10:28:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/05/21 01:44, Ben Gardon wrote: >> struct kvm_vm_stat { >> @@ -1853,4 +1859,6 @@ static inline int kvm_cpu_get_apicid(int mps_cpu) >> >> int kvm_cpu_dirty_log_size(void); >> >> +inline bool kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(struct kvm *kvm); > Woops, this shouldn't be marked inline as it creates build problems > for the next patch with some configs. > Possibly stupid (or at least lazy) question: why can't it be a "normal" static inline function? Paolo