Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750840AbWJVW7p (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:59:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750839AbWJVW7p (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:59:45 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54939 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750831AbWJVW7o (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:59:44 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: dealing with excessive includes Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:59:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Randy Dunlap , Stefan Richter , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Alexey Dobriyan , Linux Kernel Development , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <20061017005025.GF29920@ftp.linux.org.uk> <20061020091302.a2a85fb1.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610230059.23806.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 723 Lines: 17 On Sunday 22 October 2006 19:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Yes, we have lots of header include indirection going on. > > I don't know of a good tool to detect/fix it. > > BTW, what about making sure all header files are self-contained (i.e. all > header files include all stuff they need)? This would make it easier for the > users to know which files to include. Would be a worthy goal imho. Can it be done with scripts? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/