Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp529652pxj; Fri, 7 May 2021 14:08:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy6rJ+6cZOew80DZeSkSosiKi5GKZkkNTyUewdhtdSAs7CEgTKoZ/qoxyPHQg+JCG7Yf+mL X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:750:: with SMTP id p16mr13803351edy.156.1620421690448; Fri, 07 May 2021 14:08:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620421690; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VBY49Ex9DjIv+aa+cIMq9A+fQsNemPmNdYhxg+UPliCgwMAWsEL5sLqpx/QMQ/anzd +Uo9zl0ItXnJMrMXRNGj00y1IcZ10fMzfQO1yZuKi2A8MBWLZF4HAYNAoAkV4rdcMR4e VvZrKwIduczqWlfi2X3a9iZ5QWGVcITsc3p8GusIMGt6lZ0dyN/mEba5LEs01RyX/Ipf oK1rauhPoYGharxVfpysu7ZFqKZo/5k6kps52teP2i1nHL9zAEVUGnucPGcIaXD3ho4O SF+BPFQZitJJvh8RhtyoMVFGxhfr7GNkGt8EIf4IgP7JEoJqLpIysic3dY8X6rHdsYCj npCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=JEB2qpeknL6L8I5YaLmtzW0vE1cIvMk/VqIb8t+jV24=; b=o1cAFcMPrqQwJme1Me5En9vMukqKxO/1rGcrkxOiF3aMdX7YREwqH0esdj1lOX+7PG ijmdAkU974wRps5MAlTzNZfrtL+Cf6z11N3/NuNUaYzopULz09XpKjDmrG8pbyZt40XZ LQvod8GJSntzk86RZaoq4tmU25bBOBkWeqCthwHYXe2lyDseSzSM6bcsotv6HkE7DzdJ apD9fKdaLbBriIsNKzLZ6ZIgTlwAmI9NYCCeqdvxmaChEE7RUxiJQllnRor2+iqtuanF WgV7PS4yt9Y71g7LN7BtbezZTTHJ2QLcN07x4zSoHoKCWzfWs2vMAkgCjMPVSc/SWCUq n0BQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a20si5876876edx.287.2021.05.07.14.07.46; Fri, 07 May 2021 14:08:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230227AbhEGVHl (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 7 May 2021 17:07:41 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([185.11.138.130]:42608 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230093AbhEGVHk (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 May 2021 17:07:40 -0400 Received: from p5b127e83.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.18.126.131] helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lf7gA-00054f-Rs; Fri, 07 May 2021 23:06:34 +0200 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Rob Herring Cc: Johan Jonker , linus.walleij@linaro.org, bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, david.wu@rock-chips.com, zhangqing@rock-chips.com, huangtao@rock-chips.com, cl@rock-chips.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: gpio: convert rk3328-grf-gpio.txt to YAML Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 23:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: <3540274.MHq7AAxBmi@phil> In-Reply-To: <20210507210239.GA2875797@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210505134028.13431-1-jbx6244@gmail.com> <4104568.ejJDZkT8p0@phil> <20210507210239.GA2875797@robh.at.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, 7. Mai 2021, 23:02:39 CEST schrieb Rob Herring: > On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 10:59:09PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Hi Bartosz, > > > > Am Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2021, 15:40:25 CEST schrieb Johan Jonker: > > > Current dts files with RK3328 GRF 'gpio' nodes are manually verified. > > > In order to automate this process rk3328-grf-gpio.txt has to be > > > converted to YAML. > > > > > > Rename 'grf-gpio' nodename to 'gpio'. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker > > > > just to not step on any toes, do you plan to apply this patch1 later on? > > Patches 2-4 are in my domain so I'll get them after -rc1, but in theory > > the gpio binding should go through the gpio tree. > > Different trees will break the schema checks because the grf schema > refers to the gpio schema. Ah, thanks for the heads up. I guess we need to agree on one then. Bartosz, gpio tree or the rockchip tree for patches 1+2? ;-) Heiko