Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a6b23ee8d3ea78f62d3fda0b53aa273718f14c6d.1620452523.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
 <CAOc6etaUPtJqoH9DBDE72nDW7s7iEZHnaJRpKx9zFow02WOZig@mail.gmail.com> <9f34ebcd-0c17-cd7f-eb08-52c6c3dc7b03@wanadoo.fr>
In-Reply-To: <9f34ebcd-0c17-cd7f-eb08-52c6c3dc7b03@wanadoo.fr>
From:   Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 May 2021 18:06:03 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOc6etYwTvVPnoB3BQfuQEikvsCwSs9AqBWnLFrs9zQ0pJGp1A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: max77686: Remove some dead code
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc:     cw00.choi@samsung.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com,
        b.zolnierkie@samsung.com, a.zummo@towertech.it,
        alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 10:59 AM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> >
> > Following the recent conversations, I think it might make sense to do
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register RTC device: %pe\n", info->rtc_dev);
> >
> > Is that right?
> >
>
> Yes, it is right, but it should be done in another patch.
>
> Would you like to give it a try?
>
Sure, I'll have the patch ready to send it when I see yours on next.
> CJ