Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2054127pxj; Sun, 9 May 2021 13:47:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwWZTSNa+qsD9Qz6D5ienQbGZaJQyC+TC0LnikDSnDd4+Sw7TzzdMM1xzDf9MgOGCoRy8TU X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c510:: with SMTP id o16mr25471211edq.310.1620593241197; Sun, 09 May 2021 13:47:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620593241; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=I2fVWoHHdoAPlMd+Um1Q1rbNPoi0ywdJdNZ8o9S9AdV+zTAvhQzAIfcxGl268O3M7a zg6w3CqvVfmAd0JcuQkth8kJdbpEb98EjsZ2QorMkH6IPZOFfuO3wUlWLUfF5N5EaYZq t52cS2JNGwrF6W/7Wvxt2lg0pYsKAqdlVLYaHOljmbINCmGCxwOoVClZEOa5wYlnksVF I1g5ZifPB2GJPQNESpE1ZliWTSLD3gPLXC3YU7YkYHJ80IQyl68lOEIioh0wtaVfIUL+ 34EzbrDX9q8RLvI7c4ZHX1Ms7LQrWjAisSVBw8xTnDvFegFI9gmi3hKYG0cvPZKlivt6 ZgYA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ItZOnK3uHurxQxepswXxegH9QSmu5EZ1aB6/DiPynXs=; b=CYUsKwo3s4SUvtgc36VU0yOv8rJx68/KrspQaUMYghTp/W795gK3KedpXqpJZR35j0 TvIoMPqdIgQRfcInmfbxa3U7XwPuWpxaUy3G4MxqO3HWZfcIpBwCrzGY+el+9UUvPvNG 68qCZ8cxrhXwP2jDfXH1mqkdRFMqNXjACAQ3+F3ZyNDfXA4EXZ5QcmJ/Vv/22iVKQqvV fVoVdJ80CCXS863Z+EdcF4cUT0r1dXU/O2+ZJTXrFeanIqhTwsxjV1jQOLu71IjJVYY/ CFyQuPiHNoRBRxDpmh4XIaP/DyE85bcae+npzbg12yYG6X3TOHatSPgFceAhNqRvwB+H CHkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=iXv3Ouzg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x19si11927399ejo.698.2021.05.09.13.46.57; Sun, 09 May 2021 13:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=iXv3Ouzg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229933AbhEIUmh (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 May 2021 16:42:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55212 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229699AbhEIUmg (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 May 2021 16:42:36 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4722F601FD; Sun, 9 May 2021 20:41:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1620592892; bh=3kC7q5RnWbRfm2DiPPx2BVy1tt7w9Jy959UFIAMipqg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=iXv3OuzgIyjjEa7FOG7YpTbrJQ3OfhhhSCU3/lMHAG/k5oMUCl9peaVP/y936UmYH RayYQxw229KyZA09DUX2bTxwrYOV/J5+B3SRrMwm2GwWXw5vsns53sPEc58cVSNK0N FfiU8YbhmvqkCqk0blTETMXg8v9yXYcDz5qp0di17yadIttX/c3+PJGnL7pLwlqd4i 0g7/VAtEv7KZhDHptUdjhp17jhTRr8DUz57r8kPN9ZzYmh27YUmtE9GNF4nnumXWHi S/TzKkp+0+BiP3zzta3HXdxYn3TvWJdCUMvoLz49LyMLrPsuTqog5HfPCT3dQHjFBI DYqredzVAcLig== Date: Sun, 9 May 2021 23:41:30 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Zhen Lei Cc: Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe , James Bottomley , linux-integrity , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: fix error return code in tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl() Message-ID: References: <20210508025444.1977-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210508025444.1977-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 10:54:44AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling > case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function. > > Fixes: 58472f5cd4f6("tpm: validate TPM 2.0 commands") > Reported-by: Hulk Robot > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei In the commit message: 1. Instead of writing "a negative error code", write -EFAULT. 2. Some explanation of the choice. > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > index eff1f12d981a..c84d23951219 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c > @@ -656,6 +656,7 @@ int tpm2_get_cc_attrs_tbl(struct tpm_chip *chip) > > if (nr_commands != > be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&buf.data[TPM_HEADER_SIZE + 5])) { > + rc = -EFAULT; > tpm_buf_destroy(&buf); > goto out; > } > -- > 2.25.1 > > > Other than that looks good. /Jarkko