Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Sender: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes round two for 5.13-rc1
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <CAPM=9twAN82gkzrfc2CGQopjkjEdWtBKMF2DgBOtw+6RsZ++fw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wgf+kHeSZbpkZumWcTXUD7ordqTMvPRNL6aQVG1DSBDnQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <4747c9a9-1b2e-bea2-e92b-2a922d465edb@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Sun, 9 May 2021 17:47:37 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgf+kHeSZbpkZumWcTXUD7ordqTMvPRNL6aQVG1DSBDnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 5/9/21 2:08 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 11:16 AM Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Bit later than usual, I queued them all up on Friday then promptly
>> forgot to write the pull request email. This is mainly amdgpu fixes,
>> with some radeon/msm/fbdev and one i915 gvt fix thrown in.
> 
> Hmm. Gcc seems ok with this, but clang complains:
> 

Yeah, sorry, that was supposed to fix a problem, not replace it with
another one. And, as you noticed, gcc didn't complain, so I didn't
realize that I created a mess (and don't ask me why I put that
__maybe_unused after 'struct' - no idea).

Guenter

>     drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c:736:21: warning: attribute
> declaration must precede definition [-Wignored-attributes]
>     static const struct __maybe_unused seq_operations proc_fb_seq_ops = {
>                         ^
> 
> but I noticed it only after I had already pushed out the pull.
> 
> I'm actually surprised that gcc accepted that horrid mess: putting
> "__maybe_unused" between the "struct" and the struct name is very very
> wrong.
> 
> I fixed it up after the merge due to not noticing earlier..
> 
> Maybe the drm test robots should start testing with clang too?
> 
>             Linus
>