Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751877AbWJWK0y (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:26:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751878AbWJWK0y (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:26:54 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:3002 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751877AbWJWK0y (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 06:26:54 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [PATCH] Thaw userspace and kernel space separately. Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:26:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML References: <1161560896.7438.67.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> In-Reply-To: <1161560896.7438.67.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610231226.03718.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 813 Lines: 23 On Monday, 23 October 2006 01:48, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Modify process thawing so that we can thaw kernel space without thawing > userspace, and thaw kernelspace first. This will be useful in later > patches, where I intend to get swsusp thawing kernel threads only before > seeking to free memory. Please explain why you think it will be necessary/useful. I remember a discussion about it some time ago that didn't indicate we would need/want to do this. Greetings, Rafael -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/