Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932213AbWJWRiF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:38:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932228AbWJWRiF (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:38:05 -0400 Received: from smtp101.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.53.26]:14521 "HELO smtp101.plus.mail.re2.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932213AbWJWRiC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:38:02 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.de; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yT7vO2ClKKfROQyjJMfdhXxjjnGmqSSy362OZx56OPkq0a3mElKasEGowK8Z4nOUl+paYkgzLr9y1vZ4nL2Z4QLD0TyCVljZKw9sePYLElGyQwWOgVNO0bgI8u4FCZ/hYC2XrK9UaAGKyfgjJVOc6jtBxegflWTOrPJ61ElfIZg= ; Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:20:07 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Alan Cox Cc: Andrew Morton , lkml , info-linux@geode.amd.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] do not compile AMD Geode's hwcrypto driver as a module per default Message-ID: <20061023122007.GA4979@gollum.tnic> Reply-To: petkov@math.uni-muenster.de References: <20061021081745.GA6193@zmei.tnic> <1161602705.19388.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1161602705.19388.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1300 Lines: 32 On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:25:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Sad, 2006-10-21 am 10:17 +0200, ysgrifennodd Borislav Petkov: > > This one should be probably made dependent on some #define saying that the cpu > > is an AMD and has the LX Geode crypto hardware built in. Turn it off for now. > > That makes no real sense. Most kernel selections are "run on lots of > processor types", we thus want as much as possible modular, built and > available. > > The existing defaults seem quite sane. ... should the duration of the the kernel compilation be prolonged then by unneeded modules? Does the majority of people really use that crypto hardware or is it a small percentage only, we don't know but it also doesn't seem pretty sensible to do 'make oldconfig' and go and turn off all modules that I don't need/have by hand; it gets quite annoying sometimes too. -- Regards/Gru?, Boris. ___________________________________________________________ Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/