Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2736608pxj; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:35:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwl+9maz8jKWbyLXJwbHCqQ1eQy7a6uUlhOluDB6J7P/FVWVgWO/kLPfaedSP5a0617L9V X-Received: by 2002:a92:d684:: with SMTP id p4mr22944484iln.150.1620664501073; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:35:01 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1620664501; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ershShNaDN1exolYQHW2alN2o8mG7KCw5ysk6PXxFCeXecCs9jo2sjcHY5gy/Ew/xc eV2oLS01VHY0rk08EFs0ZHwWiUF6W5GruYwQC4frvUXl5qP4xRkx65Cn9mX+5QmQ8I12 4ioebCWJ9rcWHl2q/p+jYgboo6/qNs9BOCx7E+VHLSQxZe3DNApeyXi+IO2xNGzr8Sjs vq57okyDrsm99B08EQ+FtfMSLDgUrmfQt8PlsW5SmxVQ9tM/8q6fz8n8GVbR/a9K4Z/V byL0XMG1mLYyHGyUPthWu6fEDxTVrl0xF2nK8zj2XmHhH+3irtjIcNW+9DY9wwmggzo1 GHbw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=qdODaN2OuNSEexqz+L9Iw9HnmwvY9206zRfzY1Y1re8=; b=Gx5fQl8nyrYWMmK+gysYzxqnX21+UymfNZxVyAZfzcq71tTx81bTnfPy0pORu8VrEq JZkFk+Kpn4ZPNYMdd9jIqICY60PLNqZjyr96QzIp9UcWrsEEdpEqNMppH33kAOkR95/3 K3VqQQ2/Bw2XT5leaQBuviWXidQN6IVESlevYtICshq6SvGsmSrnA2awH7AQGH0a3aXY 1PjF1UmR+4J4NV2p87TyjgNXFxZVGNwo0lt3nxer6vjrfYkLsqO0or7oo+Wleb/Xwn4i PQ3dc9SYSF0UIlfV5hAnLz3v05TWufuTJkH6+cFXB096X5Rp0vOFD1ganlsjlQBuLmAz ZIdA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ivxFj92D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o21si11512258jat.63.2021.05.10.09.34.48; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ivxFj92D; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231787AbhEJQfN (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 May 2021 12:35:13 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:46973 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231636AbhEJQeu (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 12:34:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620664425; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qdODaN2OuNSEexqz+L9Iw9HnmwvY9206zRfzY1Y1re8=; b=ivxFj92DB3jzHJxbgU/64WrZI171SXPBOQ4D3QY+JG3BrlXk5z1nN23CsqdAEBks94IV1h y6dhrDnZgsUn0QBNXsnW6N23iYIS1VuiyTmsXI9yuIo/mwnDb3TiosxIwC2fyllUnZ+TZM egxiFbstvEOqyFsDg11UQ4eo6yJsbrs= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-239-TxqCBTqPOb-jNX-tJcEiuw-1; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:33:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TxqCBTqPOb-jNX-tJcEiuw-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id l2-20020adf9f020000b029010d6bb7f1cbso7686081wrf.7 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:33:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qdODaN2OuNSEexqz+L9Iw9HnmwvY9206zRfzY1Y1re8=; b=MuTHFXaZ9OgksV5wHxMYZf/EYJrOBFsCWTgiO6SMEu93tVIUuctLCzmBPBMvwTLjw/ 1hkYsNjZtjnRGaTiCn1+AWr72pMa0BKemUmFt4kvqgQE7ylIP8REnvXxVs0U9R22N0lE G1b/+Pyzo3a3JDpOv9XnVhsb4h8cpOkP/iE5EpH0/2wMEOG3ZACuU0NO77QQcWWUCovg mg1Cfc0lyS82iNZfs6xuL9/go1YJfvPwhBtjHuWOg3bdeRlClteZ4wrfmlDmJwNXNAxi aNHLhbjeg5+fHI27ISbb3ZyHQBXuUNt+rxaPNuiBcuWt3804LbkpCEM9eUUHPf+bdDqg JDAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530zf9exHlDkyyQYe/G6ncxGlkEx5oyp+6ql+Il+Rex35yjKiD1F y3J+DGlqhK/1y+l0FrmXhhr3pttAh0KwuPCBSWUBV7SnBMPtDoR6nruqGzgecvI0Z0SKbFF+ClJ HGFC2FeDYStdLcP1enc349LEl X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4acd:: with SMTP id y13mr31236156wrs.185.1620664420466; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:33:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4acd:: with SMTP id y13mr31236133wrs.185.1620664420237; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm2310454wml.38.2021.05.10.09.33.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 May 2021 09:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/mmu: Add a field to control memslot rmap allocation To: Ben Gardon Cc: LKML , kvm , Peter Xu , Sean Christopherson , Peter Shier , Yulei Zhang , Wanpeng Li , Xiao Guangrong , Kai Huang , Keqian Zhu References: <20210506184241.618958-1-bgardon@google.com> <20210506184241.618958-6-bgardon@google.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <03e66630-b967-b91c-b74e-6944bdcaf2d7@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:33:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/05/21 18:14, Ben Gardon wrote: >> Possibly stupid (or at least lazy) question: why can't it be a "normal" >> static inline function? > That was my initial approach (hence the leftover inline) but I got > some warnings about a forward declaration of struct kvm because > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h doesn't include virt/kvm/kvm_host.h. > Maybe there's a way to fix that, but I didn't want to mess with it. > Let's just use the field directly. Paolo